首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>California Medicine >Animal rights and animal experimentation. Implications for physicians.
【2h】

Animal rights and animal experimentation. Implications for physicians.

机译:动物权利和动物实验。对医生的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Practicing physicians are just becoming aware of the animal rights movement, which during the 1980s spawned numerous acts of violence against research facilities throughout the United States. The animal rightists are challenging physicians to show moral justification for the human exploitation of nature and the world of subhuman species. They have aroused public interest in animal welfare, sparked protective legislation for experimental animals, and indirectly encouraged the creation of committees to oversee the conduct of animal experimentation and the conditions of animal confinement. This controversy has necessitated a closer look at the questions of animal experimentation and animal rights against the backdrop of human experimentation and human rights. Physicians and specialists in animal care seek to alleviate suffering and anxiety, and, as moderates, they may be able to bring both sides of the animal rights controversy together in a spirit of mutual tolerance and in the common cause of promoting both human and animal welfare.
机译:执业医师刚刚意识到动物权利运动,该运动在1980年代期间在美国各地引发了许多针对研究设施的暴力行为。动物权利主义者正在挑战医师,以证明其对人类对自然界和亚人类物种世界的剥削的道义依据。他们引起了公众对动物福利的关注,激发了对实验动物的保护性立法,并间接鼓励建立委员会来监督动物实验的进行和动物隔离的条件。这一争议使得有必要在人类实验和人权的背景下仔细研究动物实验和动物权利的问题。动物保健的内科医生和专家寻求减轻痛苦和焦虑,作为温和的人,他们可以本着相互宽容的精神,并在促进人类和动物福祉的共同事业中,将动物权利争议的两方面召集在一起。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 California Medicine
  • 作者

    A. P. Gelpi;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 1991(155),3
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 260–262
  • 总页数 3
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号