首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine >Risk of Several Cancers is Higher in Urban Areas after Adjusting for Socioeconomic Status. Results from a Two-Country Population-Based Study of 18 Common Cancers
【2h】

Risk of Several Cancers is Higher in Urban Areas after Adjusting for Socioeconomic Status. Results from a Two-Country Population-Based Study of 18 Common Cancers

机译:在调整了社会经济地位之后城市地区几种癌症的风险更高。来自两个国家的基于人群的18种常见癌症研究的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Some studies suggest that there are urban–rural variations in cancer incidence but whether these simply reflect urban–rural socioeconomic variation is unclear. We investigated whether there were urban–rural variations in the incidence of 18 cancers, after adjusting for socioeconomic status. Cancers diagnosed between 1995 and 2007 were extracted from the population-based National Cancer Registry Ireland and Northern Ireland Cancer Registry and categorised by urban–rural status, based on population density of area of residence at diagnosis (rural <1 person per hectare, intermediate 1–15 people per hectare, urban >15 people per hectare). Relative risks (RR) were calculated by negative binomial regression, adjusting for age, country and three area-based markers of socioeconomic status. Risks were significantly higher in both sexes in urban than rural residents with head and neck (males RR urban vs. rural = 1.53, 95 % CI 1.42–1.64; females RR = 1.29, 95 % CI 1.15–1.45), esophageal (males 1.21, 1.11–1.31; females 1.21, 1.08–1.35), stomach (males 1.36, 1.27–1.46; females 1.19, 1.08–1.30), colorectal (males 1.14, 1.09–1.18; females 1.04, 1.00–1.09), lung (males 1.54, 1.47–1.61; females 1.74, 1.65–1.84), non-melanoma skin (males 1.13, 1.10–1.17; females 1.23, 1.19–1.27) and bladder (males 1.30, 1.21–1.39; females 1.31, 1.17–1.46) cancers. Risks of breast, cervical, kidney and brain cancer were significantly higher in females in urban areas. Prostate cancer risk was higher in rural areas (0.94, 0.90–0.97). Other cancers showed no significant urban–rural differences. After adjusting for socioeconomic variation, urban–rural differences were evident for 12 of 18 cancers. Variations in healthcare utilization and known risk factors likely explain some of the observed associations. Explanations for others are unclear and, in the interests of equity, warrant further investigation.
机译:一些研究表明,癌症发病率存在城乡差异,但是尚不清楚这些是否仅反映了城乡社会经济差异。在调整了社会经济地位之后,我们调查了18种癌症的发生率是否存在城乡差异。 1995年至2007年间诊断出的癌症摘自以人口为基础的爱尔兰国家癌症登记处和北爱尔兰癌症登记处,并根据诊断时居住地区的人口密度按城乡状况分类(农村每公顷<1人,中级1 –每公顷15人,城市> 15每公顷。相对风险(RR)通过负二项式回归计算,并根据年龄,国家和社会经济地位的三个区域指标进行了调整。食管癌(男性1.21,城市居民与农村居民的男性和女性相比,城市居民的风险显着更高(男性RR城市居民与农村居民= 1.53,95%CI为1.42-1.64;女性RR = 1.29,95%CI为1.15-1.45)) ,1.11–1.31;女性1.21,1.08–1.35),胃(男性1.36,1.27–1.46;女性1.19,1.08-1.30),结直肠癌(男性1.14,1.09–1.18;女性1.04,1.00–1.09),肺部(男性1.54,1.47-1.61;女性1.74,1.65-1.84),非黑色素瘤皮肤(男性1.13,1.10-1.17;女性1.23,1.19-1.27)和膀胱(男性1.30,1.21-1.39;女性1.31,1.17-1.46)癌症。城市地区女性患乳腺癌,宫颈癌,肾癌和脑癌的风险明显更高。农村地区前列腺癌的风险较高(0.94,0.90-0.97)。其他癌症没有城乡差异。在调整了社会经济差异之后,对于18种癌症中的12种,城乡差异明显。医疗保健利用率和已知风险因素的变化可能解释了一些观察到的关联。对于其他人的解释不清楚,为了公平起见,有待进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号