首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Randomised controlled trial of a short course of traditional acupuncture compared with usual care for persistent non-specific low back pain
【2h】

Randomised controlled trial of a short course of traditional acupuncture compared with usual care for persistent non-specific low back pain

机译:短期针刺疗法与持续性非特异性下腰痛的常规治疗比较的随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To determine whether a short course of traditional acupuncture improves longer term outcomes for patients with persistent non-specific low back pain in primary care.>Design Pragmatic, open, randomised controlled trial.>Setting Three private acupuncture clinics and 18 general practices in York, England.>Participants 241 adults aged 18-65 with non-specific low back pain of 4-52 weeks' duration.>Interventions 10 individualised acupuncture treatments from one of six qualified acupuncturists (160 patients) or usual care only (81 patients).>Main outcome measures The primary outcome was SF-36 bodily pain, measured at 12 and 24 months. Other outcomes included reported use of analgesics, scores on the Oswestry pain disability index, safety, and patient satisfaction.>Results 39 general practitioners referred 289 patients of whom 241 were randomised. At 12 months average SF-36 pain scores increased by 33.2 to 64.0 in the acupuncture group and by 27.9 to 58.3 in the control group. Adjusting for baseline score and for any clustering by acupuncturist, the estimated intervention effect was 5.6 points (95% confidence interval -0.2 to 11.4) at 12 months (n = 213) and 8.0 points (2.8 to 13.2) at 24 months (n = 182). The magnitude of the difference between the groups was about 10%-15% of the final pain score in the control group. Functional disability was not improved. No serious or life threatening events were reported.>Conclusions Weak evidence was found of an effect of acupuncture on persistent non-specific low back pain at 12 months, but stronger evidence of a small benefit at 24 months. Referral to a qualified traditional acupuncturist for a short course of treatment seems safe and acceptable to patients with low back pain.>Trial registration ISRCTN80764175.
机译:>目标:确定短期针灸疗法能否改善初级保健中持续性非特异性下腰痛患者的长期疗效。>设计实用,开放,随机对照试验。>设置在英格兰约克的3个私人针灸诊所和18个普通诊所。>参与者 241名18-65岁的成年人,腰痛为4-52周,无特异性。>干预:六名合格的针灸师之一(160名患者)或仅常规护理(81名患者)中的10种个性化针灸治疗。>主要结局指标主要结果是SF-36身体在12和24个月时测量疼痛。其他结果包括报告的使用镇痛药,Oswestry疼痛残疾指数得分,安全性和患者满意度。>结果 39名全科医生转诊了289例患者,其中241例是随机分组的。在12个月时,针刺组的SF-36平均疼痛评分增加了33.2至64.0,而对照组则增加了27.9至58.3。调整基线评分和针灸师的任何聚类,在12个月(n = 213)时,估计干预效果为5.6点(95%置信区间-0.2至11.4),在24个月(n = 182)。两组之间的差异幅度约为对照组最终疼痛评分的10%-15%。功能障碍没有改善。没有发生严重或危及生命的事件的报道。>结论。证据不足,没有发现针灸对12个月持续性非特异性下腰痛有影响,但有证据表明针灸对24个月无益处。对于腰痛的患者,转诊到合格的传统针灸师进行短期治疗似乎是安全且可接受的。>试验注册。ISRCTN80764175。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号