首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Christmas 2012: Yesterday’s World: Placebos in 19th century medicine: a quantitative analysis of the BMJ
【2h】

Christmas 2012: Yesterday’s World: Placebos in 19th century medicine: a quantitative analysis of the BMJ

机译:2012年圣诞节:昨天的世界:19世纪医学中的安慰剂:BMJ的定量分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To provide the first quantitative data on the use of the term “placebo” in the 19th century.>Design Computer search of BMJ’s archival database from January 1840 (the first issue) through December 1899 for uses of the words “placebo(s).” Grounded theory was used to categorise the implications of uses of the term. >Results 71 citations contained the term “placebo(s).” Of these, 22 (31%) used the term to mean “no effect” or as a general pejorative term, 18 (25%) portrayed placebo treatment as permitting the unfolding of the natural history (the normal waxing and waning of illness), 14 (20%) described placebo as important to satisfy patients, 7 (10%) described it as fulfilling a physician’s performance role, 3 (4%) described its use to buy time, 3 (4%) described its use for financial gain, 2 (3%) used it in a manner similar to a placebo control, and only one implied that placebo could have a clinical effect. Only one citation mentioned telling the patient about his placebo treatment.>Conclusion Nineteenth century physicians had diverse a priori assumptions about placebos. These findings remind us that contemporary medicine needs to use rigorous science to separate fact from its own beliefs concerning the “provision of care.” As in previous generations, ethical issues concerning placebos continue to challenge medicine.
机译:>目的:提供19世纪使用“安慰剂”一词的第一个定量数据。>设计:从1840年1月开始对BMJ档案数据库进行计算机搜索(第一期)到1899年12月为止使用“安慰剂”一词。扎根理论用于对术语使用的含义进行分类。 >结果:71条引用中包含“安慰剂”一词。其中22(31%)个用术语表示“无作用”或一般性贬义词,其中18(25%)表示安慰剂治疗允许自然历史的发展(正常的疾病恶化和消退), 14(20%)表示安慰剂对满足患者的重要性,7(10%)表示其可以履行医生的职责,3(4%)表示其用于购买时间,3(4%)表示其用于获取经济利益,2(3%)以类似于安慰剂对照的方式使用了它,只有一个人暗示安慰剂可以产生临床效果。 >结论:19世纪的医生对安慰剂有不同的先验假设。这些发现提醒我们,当代医学需要运用严格的科学来将事实与自己对“提供医疗服务”的信念区分开来。与前几代人一样,有关安慰剂的伦理问题继续挑战医学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号