首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Does early intervention reduce the number of elderly people with dementia admitted to institutions for long term care?
【2h】

Does early intervention reduce the number of elderly people with dementia admitted to institutions for long term care?

机译:早期干预是否会减少进入长期护理机构的老年痴呆症患者的数量?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE--To test whether early diagnosis and practical help reduce the number of elderly people with dementia admitted to institutions. DESIGN--Controlled trial of effect of help from a multidisciplinary team on admission rates of people with dementia. SETTING--Seven general practices in Cambridge. SUBJECTS--2889 subjects aged 75 and over, of whom 159 were identified as having dementia with a two stage community survey. Eighty six subjects were referred for extra help if they or their supporters wished. The other 73 subjects had access to the usual services and served as controls. INTERVENTION--Subjects and families in the action group were offered a wide range of help, including financial benefits, physical aids, home helps, respite admissions, practical advice, and psychiatric assessments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Permanent admission to long term care within two years after diagnosis. RESULTS--Early intervention did not affect admission rates in subjects who lived with supporters. By contrast, nine of the 14 (64%) subjects with moderate or severe dementia living alone were admitted in the action group in the study's second year compared with only one of 13 (8%) controls (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS--Some people with moderate or severe dementia who lived alone and were at serious risk may have been identified earlier by the resource team. Without the team these people would not have become known to the responsible authorities until families, neighbours, and wardens became unable to cope. The study was conducted during the team's formative period, however, and greater experience might have allowed some subjects to remain at home for longer.
机译:目的-测试早期诊断和实际帮助是否可以减少入院的老年痴呆症患者的数量。设计-一项多学科团队的帮助对痴呆症患者入院率影响的对照试验。地点-剑桥的七种常规做法。主题--2889,年龄为75岁及以上的受试者,通过两阶段社区调查,被确定为患有痴呆症。如果他们或他们的支持者希望,则将86个主题转给他们寻求额外帮助。其他73名受试者可以使用常规服务并担任对照。干预措施-向行动小组中的对象和家庭提供了广泛的帮助,包括经济利益,身体帮助,家庭帮助,暂缓入院,实用建议和精神病学评估。主要观察指标-诊断后两年内长期接受长期护理。结果-早期干预并未影响与支持者一起生活的受试者的入院率。相比之下,在研究的第二年,行动组接纳了14名中度或重度痴呆单独生活的14名受试者中的9名(相比之下,只有13名(8%)对照组中的一位)(p = 0.004)。结论-资源小组可能早些发现了一些独居的中度或重度痴呆症患者,并且存在严重风险。没有团队,这些人在家庭,邻居和看守无法应付之前就不会被主管当局所认识。这项研究是在团队的形成时期进行的,而更多的经验可能使某些受试者可以待在家里更长的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号