首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Terodiline with bladder retraining for treating detrusor instability in elderly people.
【2h】

Terodiline with bladder retraining for treating detrusor instability in elderly people.

机译:Terodiline与膀胱再训练一起治疗老年人逼尿肌不稳定。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE--To compare terodiline with bladder retraining against placebo with bladder retraining in the treatment of detrusor instability in frail elderly patients. DESIGN--Randomised, double blind, parallel group study. Treatment lasted for six weeks. Frequency of micturition and episodes of incontinence recorded on diary chart by patients. SETTING--Incontinence clinic and a geriatric day hospital at two teaching hospitals. PATIENTS--37 frail but ambulant patients, mean (range) age 80.4 (70-89) years with urinary frequency and urge incontinence, due to detrusor instability. Two patients withdrew before the first assessment (one in each group) and one could not complete the diary chart (placebo group). INTERVENTIONS--19 patients received bladder retraining and terodiline 25 mg daily and 18 bladder retraining and placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Change in urinary frequency and number of episodes of incontinence after six weeks' treatment. Patient's subjective evaluation of symptoms. RESULTS--Little difference was found in the results of treatment with terodiline and placebo. The change in episodes of incontinence per 24 hours was no different in the two groups (95% confidence interval -0.6 to 1.2; p = 0.75) and the difference between treatments in the change in frequency of micturition per 24 hours (-0.2) was not significant (-1.1 to 1.2; p = 0.76). Ten patients taking terodiline thought they had improved compared with seven receiving placebo; this difference was not significant. CONCLUSION--Although the number of patients in each group was small and may have been insufficient to detect a drug effect, the possible benefit of terodiline is likely to be small.
机译:目的比较特罗地林与膀胱再训练与安慰剂与膀胱再训练在体弱老年患者逼尿肌不稳定中的作用。设计-随机,双盲,平行小组研究。治疗持续了六个星期。患者在日记表上记录的排尿频率和大小便失禁。地点-失禁诊所和两家教学医院的老年日间医院。患者-37名虚弱但活跃的患者,由于逼尿肌不稳定,平均(范围)年龄80.4(70-89)岁,尿频和急迫性尿失禁。两名患者在第一次评估前退出(每组一名),而一名患者则无法填写日记表(安慰剂组)。干预措施--19患者每天接受25毫克的膀胱再培训和terodiline以及18次的膀胱再培训和安慰剂。主要观察指标-治疗六周后尿频和大小便失禁次数的变化。病人对症状的主观评价。结果-特罗地林和安慰剂的治疗结果差异不大。两组每24小时尿失禁发作的变化无差异(95%置信区间-0.6至1.2; p = 0.75),两种治疗方法之间每24小时排尿次数变化的差异为-0.2。不显着(-1.1至1.2; p = 0.76)。十名服用terodiline的患者认为与接受安慰剂的七名患者相比已有改善;这种差异并不明显。结论-尽管每组的患者人数很少并且可能不足以检测药物作用,但特洛地林的潜在益处可能很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号