首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success
【2h】

Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success

机译:使用临床决策支持系统改善临床实践:对试验的系统评价以确定对成功至关重要的特征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To identify features of clinical decision support systems critical for improving clinical practice.>Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.>Data sources Literature searches via Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to 2003; and searches of reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews.>Study selection Studies had to evaluate the ability of decision support systems to improve clinical practice.>Data extraction Studies were assessed for statistically and clinically significant improvement in clinical practice and for the presence of 15 decision support system features whose importance had been repeatedly suggested in the literature.>Results Seventy studies were included. Decision support systems significantly improved clinical practice in 68% of trials. Univariate analyses revealed that, for five of the system features, interventions possessing the feature were significantly more likely to improve clinical practice than interventions lacking the feature. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified four features as independent predictors of improved clinical practice: automatic provision of decision support as part of clinician workflow (P < 0.00001), provision of recommendations rather than just assessments (P = 0.0187), provision of decision support at the time and location of decision making (P = 0.0263), and computer based decision support (P = 0.0294). Of 32 systems possessing all four features, 30 (94%) significantly improved clinical practice. Furthermore, direct experimental justification was found for providing periodic performance feedback, sharing recommendations with patients, and requesting documentation of reasons for not following recommendations.>Conclusions Several features were closely correlated with decision support systems' ability to improve patient care significantly. Clinicians and other stakeholders should implement clinical decision support systems that incorporate these features whenever feasible and appropriate.
机译:>目的以识别对改善临床实践至关重要的临床决策支持系统的功能。>设计随机对照试验的系统评价。>数据来源通过Medline进行文献检索,CINAHL和Cochrane对照试验的注册截止到2003年; >研究选择研究必须评估决策支持系统改善临床实践的能力。>数据提取对研究进行统计学评估以及在临床实践中具有临床意义的重大改进,以及存在15个决策支持系统功能的重要性,这些功能在文献中屡次被提出。>结果包括70项研究。决策支持系统在68%的试验中显着改善了临床实践。单因素分析显示,对于五个系统功能,具有该功能的干预措施比不具有该功能的干预措施更有可能改善临床实践。多元logistic回归分析确定了改善临床实践的四个独立预测因素:作为临床医生工作流程一部分的自动提供决策支持(P <0.00001),提供建议而不只是评估(P = 0.0187),在临床医生处提供决策支持决策的时间和地点(P = 0.0263),以及基于计算机的决策支持(P = 0.0294)。在具有全部四个功能的32个系统中,有30个(94%)显着改善了临床实践。此外,还发现了直接的实验依据,可以提供定期的绩效反馈,与患者分享建议以及要求记录不遵循建议的原因。>结论一些功能与决策支持系统改善患者的能力密切相关明显地关心。临床医生和其他利益相关者应在可行和适当的情况下实施包含这些功能的临床决策支持系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号