首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials
【2h】

Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials

机译:这些数据是真实的吗?在临床试验中检测数据伪造的统计方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives To test the application of statistical methods to detect data fabrication in a clinical trial.>Setting Data from two clinical trials: a trial of a dietary intervention for cardiovascular disease and a trial of a drug intervention for the same problem.>Outcome measures Baseline comparisons of means and variances of cardiovascular risk factors; digit preference overall and its pattern by group.>Results In the dietary intervention trial, variances for 16 of the 22 variables available at baseline were significally different, and 10 significant differences were seen in means for these variables. Some of these P values were extraordinarily small. Distributions of the final recorded digit were significantly different between the intervention and the control group at baseline for 14/22 variables in the dietary trial. In the drug trial, only five variables were available, and no significant differences between the groups for baseline values in means or variances or digit preference were seen.>Conclusions Several statistical features of the data from the dietary trial are so strongly suggestive of data fabrication that no other explanation is likely.
机译:>目标在临床试验中测试统计方法在检测数据伪造中的应用。>设置来自两项临床试验的数据:一项针对心血管疾病的饮食干预试验和一项临床试验>结果测量:心血管危险因素均值和方差的基​​线比较; >结果。在饮食干预试验中,基线时可用的22个变量中的16个的方差有显着差异,并且这些变量的均值存在10个显着差异。这些P值中的一些非常小。在饮食试验中,干预组和对照组在基线时最终记录的数字分布存在显着差异,为14/22。在药物试验中,只有五个变量可用,并且在平均值,方差或数字偏好方面的基线值各组之间没有显着差异。>结论:饮食试验数据的一些统计特征是如此强烈地暗示着数据制造,以至于没有其他解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号