首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Cost effectiveness of a manual based coping strategy programme in promoting the mental health of family carers of people with dementia (the START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Cost effectiveness of a manual based coping strategy programme in promoting the mental health of family carers of people with dementia (the START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

机译:一项基于手册的应对策略计划在促进痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的心理健康方面的成本效益(START(STrAtegies for RelaTives)研究):一项实用的随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To assess whether the START (STrAtegies for RelatTives) intervention added to treatment as usual is cost effective compared with usual treatment alone.>Design Cost effectiveness analysis nested within a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.>Setting Three mental health and one neurological outpatient dementia service in London and Essex, UK.>Participants Family carers of people with dementia.>Intervention Eight session, manual based, coping intervention delivered by supervised psychology graduates to family carers of people with dementia added to usual treatment, compared with usual treatment alone.>Primary outcome measures Costs measured from a health and social care perspective were analysed alongside the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total score (HADS-T) of affective symptoms and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in cost effectiveness analyses over eight months from baseline.>Results Of the 260 participants recruited to the study, 173 were randomised to the START intervention, and 87 to usual treatment alone. Mean HADS-T scores were lower in the intervention group than the usual treatment group over the 8 month evaluation period (mean difference −1.79 (95% CI −3.32 to −0.33)), indicating better outcomes associated with the START intervention. There was a small improvement in health related quality of life as measured by QALYs (0.03 (−0.01 to 0.08)). Costs were no different between the intervention and usual treatment groups (£252 (−28 to 565) higher for START group). The cost effectiveness calculations suggested that START had a greater than 99% chance of being cost effective compared with usual treatment alone at a willingness to pay threshold of £30 000 per QALY gained, and a high probability of cost effectiveness on the HADS-T measure.>Conclusions The manual based coping intervention START, when added to treatment as usual, was cost effective compared with treatment as usual alone by reference to both outcome measures (affective symptoms for family carers, and carer based QALYs).>Trial Registration ISCTRN 70017938
机译:>目标:评估与常规治疗相比,常规治疗中添加的START(STrAtegies for RelatTives)干预是否具有成本效益。>设计成本效益分析嵌套在务实的随机对照中>设置:伦敦和英国埃塞克斯的三项心理健康和一项神经科门诊痴呆服务。>参与者痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者。>干预八与单独的常规治疗相比,受监督的心理学专业毕业生对痴呆症患者的家庭照护者进行的干预是基于手动的应对方法。>主要结果指标是从健康和社会护理角度衡量的成本从住院开始的8个月的成本效益分析中,与情感症状和质量调整生命年(QALYs)的医院焦虑和抑郁量表总分(HADS-T)进行了分析>结果在该研究招募的260名参与者中,有173名被随机分配到START干预组,而87名被单独分配到常规治疗组。在8个月的评估期内,干预组的HADS-T平均得分均低于常规治疗组(平均差异-1.79(95%CI -3.32至-0.33)),表明与START干预相关的结局更好。通过QALYs进行的健康相关生活质量改善很小(0.03(-0.01至0.08))。干预组和常规治疗组之间的费用没有差异(START组高252英镑(−28至565))。成本效益计算表明,与仅采用常规治疗相比,START愿意获得的每QALY支付门槛为£30,000的门槛,START的成本效益几率大于99%,并且HADS-T措施具有成本效益的可能性很高。>结论:通过参考两种结局指标(家庭照顾者的情感症状和基于照顾者的QALY),与常规治疗相比,基于手动的应对干预措施START比常规治疗更具成本效益。 。>试用注册 ISCTRN 70017938

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号