首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Double-blind Trial to Compare Ampicillin Cephalexin Co-trimoxazole and Trimethoprim in Treatment of Urinary Infection
【2h】

Double-blind Trial to Compare Ampicillin Cephalexin Co-trimoxazole and Trimethoprim in Treatment of Urinary Infection

机译:双盲试验比较氨苄西林头孢氨苄复方新诺明和甲氧苄啶治疗尿路感染

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In order to test their value in urinary infection a double-blind trial was carried out using ampicillin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole), and trimethoprim. Eighty-three courses of treatment were given to hospital patients, 149 to pregnant women, and 107 to patients with dysuria and frequency seen in domiciliary practice. Thus infections of varying severity in defined groups of patients caused by organisms with different antibiotic sensitivities were treated.Analysis of the overall results (339 courses) was compared with those from the individual groups and considerable variation in response was found. In domiciliary infections and bacteriuria in pregnancy trimethoprim alone proved to be at least as effective as the other three compounds and caused fewer than half the number of side effects. In the hospital patients co-trimoxazole was superior to trimethoprim.The overall results for ampicillin and cephalexin were similar although cephalexin proved to be inferior in treating symptomatic domiciliary infections.
机译:为了测试其在尿路感染中的价值,使用氨苄西林,头孢氨苄,甲氧苄氨嘧啶-磺胺甲恶唑(三甲氧唑)和甲氧苄氨嘧啶进行了双盲试验。对住院患者进行了83个疗程,对孕妇进行了149次治疗,对在院实践中出现排尿困难和尿频的患者进行了107次治疗。因此,治疗了由不同抗生素敏感性引起的特定患者组中不同严重程度的感染。将总体结果(339个疗程)与单个组的结果进行比较,发现反应差异很大。在孕妇的家庭感染和细菌尿症中,单独使用甲氧苄啶已被证明至少与其他三种化合物一样有效,并且副作用的发生率不到一半。在医院患者中,复方新诺明优于甲氧苄氨嘧啶。氨苄西林和头孢氨苄的总体结果相似,尽管头孢氨苄在症状性家庭感染的治疗方面较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号