首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Venereal Diseases >Healthy alliances?--other sexual health services and their views of genitourinary medicine.
【2h】

Healthy alliances?--other sexual health services and their views of genitourinary medicine.

机译:健康联盟?-其他性健康服务及其对泌尿生殖医学的看法。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE--To assess health professionals' views of genitourinary medicine (GUM) services in a large UK city and to determine potential intervention measures for change. METHODS--A postal questionnaire was sent to 205 service providers in a range of sexual health services in Glasgow, including GUM specialist doctors, nurses and health advisers. The questionnaire included structured questions about organisation and use of GUM services, assessment of profile and stigma, and asked about factors most likely to influence future service development. RESULTS--128 questionnaires were returned from areas throughout the city. Non-GUM health professionals had poor factual knowledge about the organisation of GUM services. GUM had a poor profile compared with other sexual health services and stigma was thought to exist about the service. Most non-GUM service providers continue traditionally to regard GUM mainly as a referral centre for a few specific sexually transmitted infections and not as a centre for holistic sexual health care. Genital chlamydial infection and pelvic inflammatory disease were considered low priority for GUM referral by some groups of service providers. These views contrasted with those working in the speciality. There was generally poor professional contact between GUM and other service providers involved in sexual health. Most indicated that greater levels of information and publicity, increased professional contact, and a broader range of services within GUM were important for future service development. CONCLUSIONS--The response to the questionnaire strongly indicates that there is poor awareness of and consequently suboptimal use of the full range of services offered by GUM. Potential interventions to address this need include increased cross-speciality collaboration and targeting of specific groups of service providers involved in sexual health care. Important groups include hospital-based specialists and voluntary agencies as well as general practitioners. There is a clear need to project the broad range of sexual health services offered by GUM, and to emphasise the role of GUM in managing specific sexual health problems including several sexually transmitted infections.
机译:目的-评估英国大城市卫生专业人员对泌尿生殖医学(GUM)服务的看法,并确定可能的变革干预措施。方法-向格拉斯哥的205个性健康服务提供者发送了邮政问卷,其中包括GUM专科医生,护士和健康顾问。问卷包括有关GUM服务的组织和使用,概要和污名评估的结构化问题,并询问了最有可能影响未来服务开发的因素。结果-从整个城市的地区返回了128份问卷。非GUM卫生专业人员对GUM服务的组织缺乏了解。与其他性健康服务相比,口香糖的形象较差,并且该服务被认为存在污名化。传统上,大多数非GUM服务提供商继续将GUM主要视为一些特定的性传播感染的转诊中心,而不是整体性保健的中心。某些服务提供者认为生殖器衣原体感染和盆腔炎不适合转诊GUM。这些观点与专门领域的观点形成鲜明对比。口香糖与其他涉及性健康的服务提供商之间的专业联系普遍较差。大多数人表示,GUM内更高水平的信息和宣传,更多的专业联系以及更广泛的服务对于将来的服务开发非常重要。结论-对问卷的答复强烈表明,人们对GUM提供的所有服务的认识不足,因此使用效果不佳。为满足这一需求,可能采取的干预措施包括加强跨专业合作,并针对涉及性保健的特定服务提供者群体。重要团体包括医院专家和志愿机构以及全科医生。显然有必要对GUM提供的广泛的性健康服务进行规划,并强调GUM在管理特定的性健康问题(包括几种性传播感染)中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号