首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Preventive Social Medicine >Short term effects of air pollution on health: a European approach using epidemiologic time series data: the APHEA protocol.
【2h】

Short term effects of air pollution on health: a European approach using epidemiologic time series data: the APHEA protocol.

机译:空气污染对健康的短期影响:一种使用流行病学时间序列数据的欧洲方法:APHEA协议。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Results from several studies over the past five years have shown that the current levels of pollutants in Europe and North America have adverse short term effects on health. The APHEA project aims to quantifying these in Europe, using standardised methodology. The project protocol and analytical methodology are presented here. DESIGN: Daily time series data were gathered for several air pollutants (sulphur dioxide; particulate matter, measured as total particles or as the particle fraction with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than a certain cut off, or as black smoke; nitrogen dioxide; and ozone) and health outcomes (the total and cause specific number of deaths and emergency hospital admissions). The data included fulfilled the quality criteria set by the APHEA protocol. SETTING: Fifteen European cities from 10 different countries with a total population over 25 million. METHODOLOGY: The APHEA collaborative group decided on a specific methodological procedure to control for confounding effects and evaluate the hypothesis. At the same time there was sufficient flexibility to allow local characteristics to be taken into account. The procedure included modelling of all potential confounding factors (that is, seasonal and long term patterns, meteorological factors, day of the week, holidays, and other unusual events), choosing the "best" air pollution models, and applying diagnostic tools to check the adequacy of the models. The final analysis used autoregressive Poisson models allowing for overdispersion. Effects were reported as relative risks contrasting defined increases in the corresponding pollutant levels. Each participating group applied the analyses to their own data. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology enabled results from many different European settings to be considered collectively. It represented the best available compromise between feasibility, comparability, and local adaptibility when using aggregated time series data not originally collected for the purpose of epidemiological studies.
机译:背景和目的:过去五年中的几项研究结果表明,欧洲和北美目前的污染物水平对健康有不利的短期影响。 APHEA项目旨在使用标准化方法对欧洲的这些进行量化。这里介绍了项目协议和分析方法。设计:每天收集几种空气污染物的时间序列数据(二氧化硫;颗粒物,以总颗粒或空气动力学直径小于特定临界值的颗粒分数或黑烟,二氧化氮和臭氧的形式测量)和健康结果(死亡总数和具体起因以及急诊入院人数)。包含的数据符合APHEA协议设定的质量标准。地点:来自10个不同国家的15个欧洲城市,总人口超过2500万。方法:APHEA合作小组决定了一种特定的方法程序,以控制混淆效果并评估假设。同时,有足够的灵活性可以考虑本地特征。该程序包括对所有潜在的混杂因素(即季节和长期模式,气象因素,星期几,节假日和其他异常事件)进行建模,选择“最佳”空气污染模型以及应用诊断工具进行检查模型的充分性。最终分析使用了自回归泊松模型,可以进行过度分散。报告的影响是相对风险,与相应污染物水平的确定增加相反。每个参与小组将分析应用于他们自己的数据。结论:这种方法使来自许多不同欧洲背景的结果可以被综合考虑。当使用最初不是为流行病学研究目的而收集的汇总时间序列数据时,它代表了可行性,可比性和局部适应性之间的最佳可行折衷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号