首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Pharmacology >Hope and Fulfillment After Complex Trauma: Using Mixed Methods to Understand Healing
【2h】

Hope and Fulfillment After Complex Trauma: Using Mixed Methods to Understand Healing

机译:复杂创伤后的希望与成就:使用混合方法来了解康复

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research has shown that the experience of Childhood Sexual Abuse (CSA) can increase the rates of physical and emotional sequela, including depression, anxiety, PTSD, and physical pain. However, little is known about the healing journeys for those women who, after surviving CSA, also experience unwanted sexual experiences (USE) as a young adult. The goal of this mixed method study is to compare identity, distress, and positive health outcomes for survivors of CSA and USE with those of women who have survived USE alone. First, 206 women completed a survey that evaluated mental health distress, trauma centrality, and health indicators, and these women were invited to take part in an additional interview. A subsample of 24 women agreed to be interviewed with a narrative interview that examined trauma recovery from a holistic perspective. Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed contextual and internal barriers and facilitators of healing. Eight qualitative dimensions were derived from code frequencies of the emerging 50 qualitative codes, including Normalization, Denial, Negative Impact, Positive Coping, Rumination, Identity Healing, Hope, and Fulfillment Healing, and Engagement Healing. We then used t-tests to compare the mean code frequencies of these code complexes for survivors of CSA/USE and USE alone, and the significant findings revealed hypotheses to be tested in the larger quantitative sample. H1: Survivors of CSA will have less denial than USE alone; H2: Survivors of CSA will have higher Negative Impact scores than USE alone, and H3: Survivors of CSA will have more Hope and Fulfillment than USE alone. H1 was supported; survivors of both CSA and USE had a significantly higher mean Centrality Scores than Survivors of USE alone. H2 was supported, and all negative impact scores were significantly higher for the survivors of both CSA and USE than survivors of USE alone. H3 was partially supported. Survivors of both CSA and USE had significantly higher mean Post-Traumatic growth scores. However, survivors of USE alone had significantly higher means for Sense of Coherence and Self-Compassion scores. Implications for practice are discussed.
机译:研究表明,童年性虐待(CSA)的经历会增加身体和情绪后遗症的发生率,包括抑郁症,焦虑症,创伤后应激障碍和身体疼痛。但是,对于那些在CSA幸存后还年轻时经历过不良性经历(USE)的女性,其康复历程知之甚少。这项混合方法研究的目标是将CSA和USE幸存者与仅在USE中幸存的女性的身份,困扰和积极健康结果进行比较。首先,有206名妇女完成了一项调查,评估精神健康困扰,创伤中心和健康指标,并邀请这些妇女参加额外的访谈。一个24位女性的子样本同意接受叙述性访谈,从整体角度考察创伤的恢复情况。访谈数据的主题分析揭示了背景和内部障碍以及促进康复的因素。从出现的50个定性代码的代码频率中得出了8个定性维度,包括规范化,拒绝,负面影响,积极应对,反刍,身份治愈,希望和成就感治疗以及参与度修复。然后,我们使用t检验比较了CSA / USE和单独使用USE幸存者的这些代码复合体的平均代码频率,重要的发现表明需要在更大的定量样本中进行测试的假设。假设1:CSA的幸存者将比单独使用USE具有更少的拒绝; H2:CSA的幸存者的负面影响得分将比单独使用的USE高,而H3:CSA的幸存者的希望和成就感将比单独USE更高。支持H1; CSA和USE的幸存者的平均中心度得分明显高于单独USE的幸存者。 H2得到了支持,CSA和USE的幸存者的所有负面影响得分均明显高于USE的幸存者。 H3得到部分支持。 CSA和USE的幸存者均具有较高的创伤后平均生长评分。但是,仅USE的幸存者具有较高的连贯感和自我同伴感得分。讨论了对实践的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号