首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Pharmacology >Endorsement and Constructive Criticism of an Innovative Online Reflexive Self-Talk Intervention
【2h】

Endorsement and Constructive Criticism of an Innovative Online Reflexive Self-Talk Intervention

机译:创新的在线反身自我对话干预的认可和建设性批评

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study prospectively followed the experiences of skilled athletes who were involved in an innovative reflexive self-talk online intervention targeting goal-directed self-talk. Four experienced female athletes between the ages of 20 and 40 years were invited to an initial interview, a 4-week intervention, and two post-intervention interviews. Two applied sport psychologists used an online Socratic questioning approach to encourage their athletes to describe challenging scenarios, think about their use of self-talk and its effectiveness, and explore alternative self-statements that could be used in future situations. Data were multi-sourced stemming from the psychologists, athletes, and third parties (e.g., coach). Three athletes completed the intervention, whereas one athlete withdrew prematurely, mainly because the Socratic questioning approach and the online mode of delivery did not meet her preferences. From the three athlete who had completed the intervention, there was endorsement and constructive criticism of the intervention and its online delivery mode. The intervention, largely due to the accompanying raised awareness of self-talk use and refined content, seemingly benefited a range of variables including emotions, motivation, and confidence, both inside and outside of the athletes’ sports life domain. Accordingly, this new type of online intervention warrants further consideration in the literature.
机译:这项研究前瞻性地研究了熟练的运动员的经验,这些运动员参与了针对目标定向自我对话的创新性反身自我对话在线干预。邀请了四名20至40岁的有经验的女运动员进行初次面试,为期4周的干预以及两次干预后面试。两名应用体育心理学家使用在线Socratic提问方法来鼓励运动员描述具有挑战性的场景,考虑他们对自言自语的使用及其有效性,并探索可以在未来情况下使用的替代性自我陈述。数据来自心理学家,运动员和第三方(例如教练)。三名运动员完成了干预,而一名运动员过早退出,主要是因为苏格拉底式的提问方法和在线交付方式不符合她的喜好。在完成干预的三位运动员中,对干预及其在线交付模式表示认可和建设性的批评。这项干预措施主要是由于随之而来的对自我对话使用和精致内容的认识的提高,似乎有益于运动员运动生活领域内外的一系列变量,包括情绪,动机和自信心。因此,这种新型的在线干预值得文献进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号