首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Industrial Medicine >Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review
【2h】

Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review

机译:肩痛的职业危险因素:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES—To systematically evaluate the available evidence on occupational risk factors of shoulder pain.
METHODS—Relevant reports were identified by a systematic search of Medline, Embase, Psychlit, Cinahl, and Current Contents. The quality of the methods of all selected publications was assessed by two independent reviewers using a standardised checklist. Details were extracted on the study population, exposures (physical load and psychosocial work environment), and results for the association between exposure variables and shoulder pain.
RESULTS—29 Studies were included in the review; three case-control studies and 26 cross sectional designs. The median method score was 60% of the maximum attainable score. Potential risk factors related to physical load and included heavy work load, awkward postures, repetitive movements, vibration, and duration of employment. Consistent findings were found for repetitive movements, vibration, and duration of employment (odds ratio (OR) 1.4-46 in studies with method scores ⩾ 60%). Nearly all studies that assessed psychosocial risk factors reported at least one positive association with shoulder pain, but the results were not consistent across studies for either high psychological demands, poor control at work, poor social support, or job dissatisfaction. Studies with a method score ⩾60% reported ORs between 1.3 and 4.0. Substantial heterogeneity across studies for methods used for exposure assessment and data analysis impeded statistical pooling of results.
CONCLUSIONS—It seems likely that shoulder pain is the result of many factors, including physical load and the psychosocial work environment. The available evidence was not consistent across studies, however, and the associations were generally not strong. Future longitudinal research should evaluate the relative importance of each individual risk factor and the role of potential confounding variables—such as exposure during leisure time—to set priorities for the prevention of shoulder pain in occupational settings.


>Keywords: systematic review; shoulder pain; risk factors
机译:目的-为了系统地评估有关肩痛的职业危险因素的现有证据。
方法-通过对Medline,Embase,Psychlit,Cinahl和Current Contents进行系统搜索,确定了相关报告。两名独立审阅者使用标准化清单对所有选定出版物的方法质量进行了评估。提取了有关研究人群,暴露(身体负荷和社会心理工作环境)以及暴露变量与肩部疼痛之间关联的结果的详细信息。
结果—29个研究包括在该评价中;三个案例对照研究和26个横截面设计。中位方法得分是最大可达到得分的60%。与身体负荷相关的潜在风险因素包括繁重的工作负荷,笨拙的姿势,重复性的动作,振动和工作时间。在重复运动,振动和就业时间方面发现一致的发现(方法得分method 60%的研究中比值比(OR)为1.4-46)。几乎所有评估心理社会危险因素的研究都报告至少与肩痛呈正相关,但由于心理需求高,工作控制差,社会支持差或工作不满意,研究结果不一致。方法得分⩾60%的研究报告OR介于1.3和4.0之间。整个研究在暴露评估和数据分析方法上的大量异质性阻碍了结果的统计汇总。
结论—肩痛似乎是许多因素的结果,包括身体负荷和心理社会工作环境。但是,各研究之间可用的证据不一致,而且相关性通常不强。未来的纵向研究应评估每个风险因素的相对重要性以及潜在的混杂变量(例如,休闲时间的暴露)的作用,以在职业环境中预防肩痛的工作重点。

< br /> >关键字:系统评价;肩部疼痛;风险因素

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号