首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Industrial Medicine >Development of an expert system for the interpretation of serial peak expiratory flow measurements in the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Midlands Thoracic Society Research Group
【2h】

Development of an expert system for the interpretation of serial peak expiratory flow measurements in the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Midlands Thoracic Society Research Group

机译:开发用于解释职业性哮喘诊断中的连续峰值呼气流量测量值的专家系统。中部地区胸科学会研究小组

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

If asthma is due to work exposures there must be a relation between these exposures and the asthma. Asthma causes airway hyperresponsiveness and obstruction; the obstruction can be measured with portable meters, which usually measure peak expiratory flow, or sometimes forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). These can be measured serially (for instance 2 hourly) over several weeks at and away from work. Once occupational asthma develops, the asthma will be induced by many non-specific triggers common to non-occupational asthma. The challenge is to identify changes in peak expiratory flow due to work among other non-occupational causes. Standard statistical tests have been found to be insensitive or non-specific, principally because of the variable period for deterioration to occur after exposure, and the sometimes prolonged time for recovery to occur, such that days away from work may initially have lower measurements than days at work. A computer assisted diagnostic aid (Oasys) has been developed to separate occupational from non-occupational causes of airflow obstruction. Oasys-2 is based on a discriminant analysis, and achieved a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of at least 94%; therefore peak expiratory flow monitoring combined with Oasys-2 analysis is better to confirm than to exclude occupational asthma. A neural network version in development has improved on this. Both have been based on expert interpretation of peak flow measurements plotted as daily maximum, mean, and minimum, with the first reading at work taken as the first reading of the day. Oasys has been evaluated with independent criteria against measurements made in a wide range of occupational situations. Oasys is sufficiently developed to be the initial method for the confirmation, although less so for exclusion of occupational asthma.  
机译:如果哮喘是由于工作暴露引起的,则这些暴露与哮喘之间必须存在联系。哮喘引起气道反应过度和阻塞;可以使用便携式仪表测量梗阻,该仪表通常测量呼气峰值流量,有时还可以测量1秒内的强制呼气量(FEV1)。这些可以在几周内和下班后连续(例如每小时2小时)进行测量。一旦发生职业性哮喘,哮喘将由非职业性哮喘常见的许多非特异性触发因素诱发。面临的挑战是要确定由于其他非职业原因而导致的呼气高峰流量的变化。已发现标准统计测试不灵敏或不具特异性,主要是因为暴露后变质的时间长短不一,有时恢复时间有时延长,因此离开工作的天数最初可能少于天数。工作中。已经开发了一种计算机辅助诊断辅助工具(Oasys),用于将气流阻塞的职业原因与非职业原因分开。 Oasys-2基于判别分析,灵敏度为75%,特异性至少为94%;因此,峰值呼气流量监测与Oasys-2分析相结合比排除职业性哮喘更容易确定。正在开发的神经网络版本对此进行了改进。两者均基于专家对峰值流量测量的解释,绘制为每日的最大值,平均值和最小值,而工作时的第一读数被视为当天的第一读数。 Oasys已针对各种职业情况下进行的测量以独立的标准进行了评估。 Oasys已被充分开发成为确认的最初方法,尽管排除职业性哮喘的方法很少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号