首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Industrial Medicine >Assessing the Heat Stress and Establishing the Limits for Work in a Hot Mine
【2h】

Assessing the Heat Stress and Establishing the Limits for Work in a Hot Mine

机译:评估热应力并确定热矿的工作极限

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The management of the mine at Mount Isa, Queensland, Australia decided to enquire into the following questions with regard to men working underground in hot conditions:(a) Which of the various heat stress indices predicts most accurately the effects on workmen of the various heat stress factors which occur in the mine at Mount Isa?(b) How best should the limits of heat stress be judged at which the normal 8-hour shift should be reduced to a 6-hour shift, or at which work should be stopped?With these objects in mind, oral temperatures were measured on 86 workmen after three hours of ordinary work in the mine and also on 36 occasions on 29 volunteers after three hours of stepping on and off a stool at a work rate of 1,560 ft. lb./min. These men were studied in different environmental heat stresses over the range that occurs in the mine. Dry bulb air temperatures (D.B.), wet bulb temperatures (W.B.), velocity of air movements, and globe temperatures (G.T.) were measured in the micro-climate in which each man worked. An estimate was made of the work rate of the 86 workmen. From these estimates and measurements, the predicted 4-hourly sweat rate (P4SR) and corrected effective temperature (C.E.T.) values were determined for each heat stress condition. P4SR values varied between 0·9 and 6·5 and C.E.T. between 70° and 95°F.Correlation coefficients were calculated between oral temperatures and W.B.s, C.E.T.s, and P4SRs and are 0·51, 0·64, and 0·75 respectively. Further analysis was confined to C.E.T. and P4SR. Plots of oral temperature on P4SR for conditions where G.T. was more than 10°F. above D.B. were found to fall well below the rest of the plots, indicating that P4SR exaggerates the effect of mean radiant temperature. These data were therefore excluded from the rest of the analysis. Regression equations were calculated for oral temperature on P4SR and for oral temperature on C.E.T. for (a) men `on the job', for (i) conditions where D.B. was more than 10°F. above W.B. and (ii) for conditions where D.B. was less than 10°F. above W.B., and (b) for men `stepping'. This analysis showed that one overall regression line can be used for all three conditions for oral temperature on P4SR, but for oral temperature on C.E.T. at least two different regression lines would be needed. Also the correlation coefficients between oral temperature and P4SR were generally higher than between oral temperature and C.E.T. For the prediction of oral temperature in the mine at Mount Isa the P4SR index is to be preferred to the C.E.T. scale.These results indicate that the emphasis given to G.T. in the P4SR index is too great. A multi-variance analysis of the P4SR index shows that, in the middle of the range of heat stress conditions examined, a unit change in P4SR would be obtained by about the same change in W.B. and G.T. This is at variance with the present results and also with the experimental findings of the M.R.C. Climatic Physiology Unit at Singapore. It appears, therefore, that the P4SR index should be revised in this regard.When it came to setting limits of heat stress for a 6-hour shift and for `stop-work', it was decided to base the limit for the 6-hour shift on a 1:100 probability of men reaching an oral temperature of 100·5°F. (rectal temperature of 101·5°F.) and to base the `stop work' limit on a 1:2,000 probability of reaching an oral temperature of 101·5°F. (rectal temperature of 102·5°F.). The reasons for this choice of physiological criteria are given in full in the paper. P4SR values at which these limits are reached were determined by calculating 1:100 and 1:2,000 probability belts to the overall regression line of oral temperature on P4SR. The P4SR value at the intersection of the 1:100 probability limit and the oral temperature of 100·5°F. is 3·8 and the P4SR value at the intersection of the 1:2,000 probability limit and the oral temperature of 101·5°F. is 5·0. These then are the limits of heat stress in the mine at Mount Isa for a 6-hour shift and for `stop-work'.A simple graphical method has been developed and is in use in the mine for determining when the level of work and environmental heat stress have reached either a P4SR value of 3·8, when the shift is reduced to six hours; or, when the heat stress has reached a P4SR value of 5·0, when work is stopped.
机译:澳大利亚昆士兰州伊萨山的矿山管理层决定针对在炎热条件下在地下工作的人调查以下问题:(a)各种热应力指数中的哪一个最准确地预测了各种热对工人的影响(b)如何最好地判断热应力的极限,在这种极限下,正常的8小时制应该减少到6小时制,或者应该停止工作?考虑到这些目标,在矿井中进行了三小时的常规工作后,对86名工人的口腔温度进行了测量,并且在以1,560 ft。lb的速度踩下粪便三个小时后,对29名志愿者进行了36次测量。 /分钟。在矿山发生的范围内,对这些人进行了不同的环境热应力研究。在每个人工作的微气候中,测量干球温度(D.B.),湿球温度(W.B.),空气运动速度和球体温度(G.T.)。估算了86名工人的工作率。根据这些估计和测量结果,可以确定每种热应激条件下的预计4小时出汗率(P4SR)和校正后的有效温度(C.E.T.)值。 P4SR值在0·9和6·5之间以及C.E.T.口腔温度与W.B.s,C.E.T.s和P4SR之间的相关系数分别为0·51、0·64和0·75。进一步的分析仅限于C.E.T.和P4SR。在G.T.的条件下P4SR上的口腔温度图高于10°F。在D.B.以上发现P4SR远远低于其余图,表明P4SR夸大了平均辐射温度的影响。因此,将这些数据排除在其余分析之外。计算P4SR上的口腔温度和C.E.T.上的口腔温度的回归方程式。 (a)从事工作的男性;(i)D.B.高于10°F。高于W.B. (ii)对于D.B.低于10°F。 (b)代表男性“踩”。该分析表明,一条总体回归线可用于P4SR的所有三种口腔温度条件,而C.E.T.至少需要两条不同的回归线。口服温度和P4SR之间的相关系数也普遍高于口服温度和C.E.T.为了预测伊萨山矿山的口腔温度,相对于C.E.T.这些结果表明对G.T.在P4SR索引中太大。 P4SR指数的多方差分析表明,在所考察的热应力条件范围的中间,P.4的单位变化将通过W.B的相同变化获得。和G.T.这与目前的结果以及M.R.C.新加坡气候生理科。因此,似乎应该在这方面修订P4SR指数。当要设定6小时班次和“停工”的热应力极限时,决定将6极限值作为基准。在1:100的男性达到口腔温度100·5°F的可能性下,每小时进行一次小时转换。 (直肠温度为101·5°F。),并以达到口腔温度101·5°F的1:2,000概率作为“停止工作”极限的基础。 (直肠温度为102·5°F。)。选择生理标准的原因在本文中有完整介绍。通过计算相对于口服温度在P4SR上的总体回归线的1:100和1:2,000概率带来确定达到这些极限的P4SR值。在1:100的概率极限与100·5°F的口腔温度的交点处,P 4 SR值。为3·8,P 4 值在1:2,000的概率极限与101·5°F的口腔温度的交点处。是5·0。这些就是六小时班次和“停工”时伊萨山矿山热应力的极限。已经开发了一种简单的图形方法,用于矿山中,确定何时以及何时进行工作。当偏移减少到六小时时,环境热应力达到P 4 SR值3·8。或者,当热应力达到5·0的P 4 SR值时,停止工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号