首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Heart Journal >Evaluation of an elliptical area technique for calculating mitral blood flow by Doppler echocardiography.
【2h】

Evaluation of an elliptical area technique for calculating mitral blood flow by Doppler echocardiography.

机译:通过多普勒超声心动图评估用于计算二尖瓣血流的椭圆面积技术。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To evaluate a method for measuring blood flow through the mitral valve 18 normal subjects and 19 patients with cardiac disease in whom mitral and aortic blood flows were identical were studied. Initially the mitral ring area was planimetered from the echocardiographic image, but the results of area calculation using the mathematical formula for the area of an ellipse were found to approximate to within 8% of the planimetered result in most cases. The formula was therefore used if the ring appeared elliptical on the cross sectional echo image, and other shapes were planimetered. Mitral velocity, aligned with flow in three planes, was recorded just distal to the ring. Mitral flow calculated using the elliptical technique correlated closely with flow measured in the ascending aorta by the Doppler technique and also with systemic flow measured by the Fick method at cardiac catheterisation in 10 patients. The mitral flow technique that assumed a circular orifice correlated almost as well with Doppler aortic flow and with Fick flow but overestimated flow by a mean of 1446 ml, whereas the elliptical method had a mean error of only 138 ml. Both methods correlated well with standards, but the elliptical method was easy to apply and gave a better correlation with comparison reference values.
机译:为了评估测量通过二尖瓣的血流的方法,研究了18名正常人和19名患有二尖瓣和主动脉血流相同的心脏病患者。最初,二尖瓣环的面积是从超声心动图图像中测得的,但在大多数情况下,发现使用椭圆面积的数学公式进行面积计算的结果大约是平面化结果的8%之内。因此,如果该环在横截面回波图像上看起来是椭圆形,并且其他形状是平面的,则使用该公式。刚好在环的远端记录了与三个平面中的血流对齐的二尖瓣速度。使用椭圆技术计算的二尖瓣血流与通过多普勒技术在升主动脉中测量的血流以及通过Fick方法在心脏导管插入术中测量的10名患者的全身血流密切相关。假定为圆形孔口的二尖瓣血流技术与多普勒主动脉血流和Fick血流几乎相关,但是高估了平均流量1446 ml,而椭圆法的平均误差仅为138 ml。两种方法均与标准相关,但椭圆方法易于应用,并且与比较参考值具有更好的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号