首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open Access >Can tobacco control endgame analysis learn anything from the US experience with illegal drugs?
【2h】

Can tobacco control endgame analysis learn anything from the US experience with illegal drugs?

机译:烟草控制残局分析能否从美国对非法药物的经验中学到什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The goals of tobacco control endgame strategies are specified in terms of the desired levels of tobacco use and/or tobacco related health consequences. Yet the strategies being considered may have other consequences beyond tobacco use prevalence, forms and related harms. Most of the proposed strategies threaten to create large black markets with potential attendant harms: corruption, high illegal earnings, violence and/or organised crime. Western societies of course have considerable experience with these problems in the context of prohibition of drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine. These experiences suggest that low prevalence has been achieved only by tough enforcement with damaging unintended consequences. Tobacco prohibition (total or partial) may not present the same trade-off but there is little basis for making a projection of the scale, form and harms of the attendant black markets. Nonetheless, these harms should not be ignored in analyses of the endgame proposals.
机译:根据所需的烟草使用水平和/或与烟草相关的健康后果,规定了控烟最终策略的目标。然而,正在考虑的策略可能会带来除烟草使用流行率,形式和相关危害以外的其他后果。大多数提议的战略都威胁要建立具有潜在危害的大型黑市:腐败,高额非法收入,暴力和/或有组织犯罪。西方社会当然在禁止诸如大麻,可卡因,海洛因和甲基苯丙胺之类的毒品的背景下对这些问题有丰富的经验。这些经验表明,只有通过强行执行并破坏意想不到的后果,才能实现较低的患病率。禁止烟草(全部或部分禁止烟草)可能不会带来相同的权衡,但没有依据来预测随之而来的黑市的规模,形式和危害。但是,在分析残局建议时不应忽略这些危害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号