首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open Access >On illness and value: biopolitics psychosomatics participating bodies
【2h】

On illness and value: biopolitics psychosomatics participating bodies

机译:关于疾病和价值:生物政治学心理治疗学参与机构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In its heyday, around the mid-twentieth century, psychosomatic medicine was promoted as heralding a new science of body/mind relations that held the promise of transforming medicine as a whole. Sixty years on, the field appears to have achieved no more than a respectable position as a research specialism within the medical status quo. This paper articulates the problematic of psychosomatics through a number of propositions that reconnect its promise of novelty to the present and to contemporary concerns. In contrast to classic approaches to ‘psychosomatic problems’, which typically set out by denouncing the conceptual inadequacy of mind/body dualism, the focus proposed is on the resilience of dualism as an empirical datum deserving closer analysis. The paper thus asks: what is the character of dualism considered under the aspect of what it achieves, and thus as an expression of value? Drawing on the thought of A N Whitehead, Michel Foucault and Viktor von Weizsäcker, the argument formulates a set of ‘psychosomatic problems’ informed by the concept of biopolitics and introduces their relevance in relation to the politics of participatory medicine.
机译:在二十世纪中叶的鼎盛时期,心身医学得到了推广,预示着一种崭新的身体/心理关系科学,它有望从整体上改变医学。六十年来,该领域似乎在医学现状上仅作为研究专长获得了可观的地位。本文通过许多主张来阐明心理疗法的问题,这些主张将其新颖性的承诺与当前和当代关注重新联系起来。与通常通过谴责心理/身体二元论在概念上不足而提出的解决“心身问题”的经典方法相反,提出的重点是将二元论作为一种经验数据来进行弹性研究,值得进一步分析。因此,本文提出了一个问题:在二元论所实现的方面并因此作为价值的表达,二元论的特征是什么?该论据借鉴了A N Whitehead,Michel Foucault和Viktor vonWeizsäcker的思想,提出了一系列以生物政治学为基础的“心身问题”,并介绍了它们与参与医学政治的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号