首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >Experts’ opinions on terminology for complementary and integrative medicine – a qualitative study with leading experts
【2h】

Experts’ opinions on terminology for complementary and integrative medicine – a qualitative study with leading experts

机译:专家对补充和集成医学术语的看法–与领先专家进行的定性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundIntegrative medicine (IM) is currently the most commonly used term to describe the integration of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) into conventional medicine. In the definitions of IM the most important feature is the focus on evidence as crucial factor for therapeutic decision-making. However, there are discussions on the term “integrative medicine” with the most notable critique from within CAM that it describes the integration of complementary methods into conventional institutions and into a “conventional framework of thinking”. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand the thoughts of leading experts on IM and on the scientific debate in the field as well as their personal opinions about terminology in general.
机译:背景技术中西医结合治疗(IM)是目前最常用的术语,用于描述补充和替代医学(CAM)与常规药物的结合。在IM的定义中,最重要的特征是将重点放在作为治疗决策关键因素的证据上。但是,关于“中西医结合”一词的讨论在CAM中最为明显,它描述了将互补方法整合到传统机构和“传统思维框架”中的情况。这项定性研究的目的是了解IM专家和该领域的科学辩论方面的主要思想以及他们对术语的一般性看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号