The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of techniques for soft tissue augmentation in the placement of immediate implants with and without provisionalization and to assess the quality of the reports in the literature. Randomized clinical trials, prospective clinical trials, and case series were included in this review. Clinical questions were formulated and organised according to the PICOS strategy. An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and ISI Web up until June 2016. Interexaminer agreement on eligibility (k = 0.842; p = 0.103) and quality (k = 0.933; p < 0.001) was high. Methodological approaches were assessed using criteria based on design related forms designed by the Dutch Cochrane Collaboration. Finally, 14 papers were identified. In two studies, the implant survival was 90%; for the rest of the studies it was 100%. All studies reported favourable aesthetic, biological, and radiographic outcomes. Surgical and biomechanical complications of this technique were not relevant. This technique effectively compensates for the expected loss of volume of the oral soft tissues and maintains high success rates with good aesthetic results over time.
展开▼
机译：这项研究的目的是评估在进行临时植入和不进行临时植入的情况下，在立即植入植入物中植入软组织的技术的有效性，并评估文献报道的质量。该评价包括随机临床试验，前瞻性临床试验和病例系列。根据PICOS策略制定和组织临床问题。在PubMed，Cochrane对照试验中心登记册，Scopus和ISI Web上进行了电子搜索，直至2016年6月。检查员关于资格（k = 0.842; p = 0.103）和质量（k = 0.933; p <0.001）的协议是高。方法学方法基于荷兰Cochrane合作组织设计的与设计相关的表格，基于标准进行评估。最终确定了14篇论文。在两项研究中，植入物的存活率为90％。在其余研究中，该比例为100％。所有研究均报告了良好的美学，生物学和放射学结果。该技术的外科手术和生物力学并发症无关。该技术有效地补偿了口腔软组织的预期体积损失，并保持了较高的成功率，并且随着时间的推移具有良好的美学效果。
展开▼
