首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Arthritis Research >Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT the German biologics register
【2h】

Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT the German biologics register

机译:临床和功能缓解:即使生物制剂优于常规DMARD整体成功率仍然很低–来自RABBIT的结果德国生物制剂注册

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We investigated the frequency of remission according to the disease activity score (DAS28) definition, modified American Rheumatology Association (ARA) criteria, and the frequency of an achievement of a functional status above defined thresholds ('functional remission', 'physical independence') in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with either biologics or conventional DMARDs. We used the data of a prospective cohort study, the German biologics register RABBIT (German acronym for Rheumatoid Arthritis – Observation of Biologic Therapy) to investigate the outcomes in RA patients with two or more DMARD failures who received new treatment with biologics (BIOL; n = 818) or a conventional DMARD (n = 265). Logistic regression analysis was applied to adjust for differences in baseline risks. Taking risk indicators such as previous DMARD failures or baseline clinical status into account, we found that biologics doubled the chance of remission compared to conventional DMARD therapies (DAS28 remission, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.95 (95% confidenece interval (CI) 1.2–3.2)); ARA remission, OR 2.05 (95% CI 1.2–3.5)). High remission rates (DAS28 remission, 30.6%; ARA remission, 16.9%) were observed in BIOL patients with a moderate disease activity (DAS28, 3.2 to 5.1) at the start of treatment. These rates decreased to 8.5% in patients with DAS28 > 6. Sustained remission at 6 and 12 months was achieved in <10% of the patients. Severely disabled patients (≤50% of full function) receiving biologic therapies were significantly more likely to achieve a status indicating physical independence (≥67% of full function) than controls (OR 3.88 (95% CI 1.7–8.8)). 'Functional remission' (≥83% of full function) was more often achieved in BIOL than in controls (OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.04–4.6)). In conclusion, our study shows that biologics increase the chance to achieve clinical remission and a status of functional remission or at least physical independence. However, temporary or even sustained remission remain ambitious aims, which are achieved in a minority of patients only.
机译:我们根据疾病活动评分(DAS28)定义,修改后的美国风湿病协会(ARA)标准以及达到定义阈值以上的功能状态(“功能缓解”,“身体独立性”)的频率调查了缓解频率类风湿关节炎(RA)患者接受生物制剂或常规DMARD治疗。我们使用了一项前瞻性队列研究的数据,即德国生物制剂公司注册的RABBIT(德国类风湿关节炎的缩写–生物学疗法的观察)来调查患有两种或多种DMARD失败的RA患者接受生物制剂新疗法的结局(BIOL; n = 818)或常规DMARD(n = 265)。应用逻辑回归分析来调整基线风险的差异。考虑到先前的DMARD失败或基线临床状况等风险指标,我们发现与传统DMARD治疗相比,生物制剂的缓解机会翻了一番(DAS28缓解,调整后的优势比(OR)1.95(95%置信区间(CI)1.2 – 3.2)); ARA缓解,或2.05(95%CI 1.2–3.5)。在治疗开始时,具有中等疾病活动度(DAS28,3.2至5.1)的BIOL患者观察到较高的缓解率(DAS28缓解,30.6%; ARA缓解,16.9%)。在DAS28> 6的患者中,这些比率降低到8.5%。在6%和12个月时,<10%的患者获得了持续缓解。接受生物疗法治疗的严重残疾患者(≤全部功能的50%)比对照组(OR 3.88(95%CI 1.7–8.8))更有可能达到表明身体独立的状态(≥全部功能的67%)。与对照组相比,BIOL更常实现“功能缓解”(≥功能的83%)(OR 2.18(95%CI 1.04–4.6))。总之,我们的研究表明,生物制剂增加了获得临床缓解的机会,并增加了功能缓解或至少身体独立的状态。然而,暂时或什至持续缓解仍然是雄心勃勃的目标,只有少数患者才能实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号