首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Archives of Emergency Medicine >Facilities and equipment in district general hospitals in the Netherlands: Are we prepared for the critically ill paediatric patients?
【2h】

Facilities and equipment in district general hospitals in the Netherlands: Are we prepared for the critically ill paediatric patients?

机译:荷兰地区综合医院的设施和设备:我们是否已为重症儿科患者做好准备?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To evaluate the inventory for initial treatment of critically ill children. >Design: Prospective study. >Setting: Paediatric emergency settings in 15 major district general hospitals. >Methods: Using an "expert opinion" created by paediatric intensivists, all hospitals were visited twice to check the inventory. Firstly, to examine the initial site of emergency care for children coming from outside the hospital. Secondly, to visit other emergency sites. A total score below 75% of the optimum was considered as not optimally equipped. >Main results: Equipment to meet "respiratory problems" was considered by the experts as most essential. Seventy five per cent of all emergency sites scored below 75 % (4 of 11 paediatric departments, 1 of 15 emergency rooms. The emergency room was in all aspects significantly better equipped than the paediatric department. Major differences and variations in the inventory were identified between all hospitals. >Conclusions: Emergency rooms are better equipped to meet the needs of critically ill paediatric patients coming from outside the hospital than the paediatric departments. Paediatricians involved in the treatment of children who become critically ill during their stay in the hospital (the "indoor" patients), have less equipment and medication on the paediatric department at their disposal than on their emergency room. Obviously, emergency care on the paediatric wards should be equipped at the same level as in the emergency room because for both locations the "golden hour" is critically important in final outcome.
机译:>目的:评估重症儿童的初始治疗清单。 >设计:前瞻性研究。 >设置:15家主要地区综合医院的儿科急诊设置。 >方法:使用儿科专科医师创建的“专家意见”,对所有医院进行了两次访问以检查清单。首先,检查来自医院外的儿童的急救地点。其次,参观其他紧急地点。总分低于最佳分数的75%被认为不是最佳装备。 >主要结果:专家们认为,解决“呼吸问题”的设备是最重要的。 75%的急诊部位得分低于75%(11个儿科部门中的4个,15个急诊室中的1个。急诊室在各个方面的配置都明显优于儿科部门。在清单之间发现了主要差异和差异>结论:急诊室比儿科部门能更好地满足医院外部的危重儿科患者的需求。儿科医生参与治疗在住院期间患重病的儿童在医院(“室内”病人),儿科部门要配备的设备和药物要少于急诊室。显然,儿科病房的急救设施应与急诊室相同。对于两个地点而言,“黄金时段”对于最终结果至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号