首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annual Meeting of the American Climatological Association >Theodore E. Woodward Award Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Employed By Major American Cities During the 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic
【2h】

Theodore E. Woodward Award Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Employed By Major American Cities During the 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic

机译:西奥多·伍德沃德奖(Theodore E. Woodward Award)在1918–19年流感大流行期间美国主要城市采取的非药物干预措施

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A critical question in pandemic influenza planning is the role that non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) such as isolation and quarantine, social distancing, and school closure, might play in delaying the temporal impact of a pandemic, reducing the overall and peak attack rate, and reducing the number of cumulative deaths. Such measures could potentially provide valuable time for pandemic-strain vaccine and antiviral medication production and distribution. Optimally, appropriate NPI implementation would decrease the burden on healthcare services and critical infrastructure. These public health measures, however, are often associated with enormous social and economic costs. Therefore, it is imperative to assess past applications of NPIs in order to better understand how they might (or might not) be employed during future pandemics in an effective, legal, ethical manner that inspires confidence and compliance in the public at large.
机译:大流行性流感规划中的一个关键问题是,隔离和检疫,社会隔离和学校关闭等非药物干预(NPI)可能在延迟大流行的时间影响,降低总体发作率和高峰发作率方面发挥作用,并减少累计死亡人数。这些措施可能为大流行株疫苗和抗病毒药物的生产和分发提供宝贵的时间。最佳地,适当地实施NPI将减轻医疗保健服务和关键基础设施的负担。但是,这些公共卫生措施通常会带来巨大的社会和经济成本。因此,必须评估NPI的过去应用,以便更好地了解在未来的流行病中如何(或不可以)以有效,合法,合乎道德的方式使用NPI,以激发公众的信心和合规性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号