首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Evidence-Based Pain Management: Building on the Foundations of Cochrane Systematic Reviews
【2h】

Evidence-Based Pain Management: Building on the Foundations of Cochrane Systematic Reviews

机译:循证疼痛管理:基于Cochrane系统评价的基础

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We discuss the history and current status of evidence-based medicine for the prevention and treatment of acute and chronic pain as it has developed in the Cochrane Collaboration’s Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group.To date, the Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group has published 277 reviews and a further 11 reviews of systematic reviews summarizing the evidence for interventions. The Cochrane Library has readily available high-quality summaries of evidence of pharmacological interventions especially for postsurgical pain but also for chronic musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain. The library covers all forms of intervention, not only pharmacological.The world of evidence-based medicine is changing: most historical trials have been entered into reviews, but the evidence is still not well disseminated and needs to be better translated into decision support. Evidence should be at the heart of policymaking. Much has been achieved in the past 21 years, but there are no grounds for complacency.
机译:我们将讨论Cochrane协作组织疼痛,姑息和支持治疗审查小组开发的预防和治疗急性和慢性疼痛的循证医学的历史和现状。迄今为止,疼痛,姑息和支持治疗审查小组对此进行了介绍。该小组发表了277条评论以及系统评论的另外11条评论,总结了干预的证据。 Cochrane图书馆提供了高质量的药理学干预证据摘要,特别是对于术后疼痛,以及慢性肌肉骨骼和神经性疼痛。图书馆不仅涵盖药理学,还涵盖了所有形式的干预措施。循证医学的世界正在发生变化:大多数历史试验已进入审查阶段,但证据仍不能很好地传播,需要更好地转化为决策支持。证据应该是决策的核心。在过去的21年中已经取得了很多成就,但是没有自满的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号