首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Health Preemption Behind Closed Doors: Trade Agreements and Fast-Track Authority
【2h】

Health Preemption Behind Closed Doors: Trade Agreements and Fast-Track Authority

机译:封闭大门后的健康优先权:贸易协定和快速通道授权

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Noncommunicable diseases result from consuming unhealthy products, including tobacco, which are promoted by transnational corporations. The tobacco industry uses preemption to block or reverse tobacco control policies. Preemption removes authority from jurisdictions where tobacco companies’ influence is weak and transfers it to jurisdictions where they have an advantage.International trade agreements relocate decisions about tobacco control policy to venues where there is little opportunity for public scrutiny, participation, and debate. Tobacco companies are using these agreements to preempt domestic authority over tobacco policy. Other transnational corporations that profit by promoting unhealthy foods could do the same.“Fast-track authority,” in which Congress cedes ongoing oversight authority to the President, further distances the public from the debate. With international agreements binding governments to prioritize trade over health, transparency and public oversight of the trade negotiation process is necessary to safeguard public health interests.
机译:非传染性疾病是由食用不健康的产品(包括烟草)引起的,跨国公司促进了这种产品的发展。烟草业利用抢占来阻止或逆转烟草控制政策。抢占将权力从烟草公司影响力薄弱的辖区转移到拥有优势的辖区。国际贸易协议将有关烟草控制政策的决定转移到几乎没有公众审查,参与和辩论的场所。烟草公司正在利用这些协议抢占国内对烟草政策的授权。其他通过宣传不健康食品而获利的跨国公司也可以这样做。“快速授权”是国会将持续的监督权交给总统的做法,这进一步使公众远离了辩论。随着具有约束力的国际协议政府将贸易置于健康之上,政府必须对贸易谈判过程进行透明化和公众监督,以维护公共卫生利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号