首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Glen or Glenda: Reported Gender of Sex Partners in Two Statewide HIV Databases
【2h】

Glen or Glenda: Reported Gender of Sex Partners in Two Statewide HIV Databases

机译:Glen或Glenda:两个州艾滋病毒数据库中的性伴侣性别报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. We assessed agreement of reported gender of sex partners in 2 statewide HIV databases linked by client identifiers.Methods. Counseling, testing, and referral (CTR) records on all men aged 18 to 30 years who tested newly positive for HIV in North Carolina between 2000 and 2005 were matched to data abstracted from partner counseling and referral services (PCRS) records. We compared client-reported gender of sex partners at the time of testing (CTR records) with those reported during postdiagnosis partner notification (PCRS records).Results. PCRS records appeared to be a more complete measure of the gender of sex partners. Of the 212 men who told their HIV test counselor that they had only had female sex partner or partners in their lifetime, 62 (29.2%) provided contact information for male sex partner(s) during partner notification.Conclusions. During the test counseling risk assessment, many men did not fully report the gender of their sex partners; this suggests that CTR data may not fully capture clients' risk behaviors.
机译:目标。我们在由客户标识符链接的两个州范围内的HIV数据库中评估了性伴侣的性别报告协议。 2000年至2005年间,北卡罗来纳州所有新检测出HIV阳性的18至30岁男性的咨询,测试和转诊(CTR)记录与从伴侣咨询和转诊服务(PCRS)记录中提取的数据相匹配。我们将测试时客户报告的性伴侣的性别(CTR记录)与诊断后性伴侣通知期间报告的性别(PCRS记录)进行了比较。 PCRS记录似乎可以更完整地衡量性伴侣的性别。在212名告诉其HIV检测咨询师一生中只有女性伴侣的男性中,有62名(29.2%)在伴侣通知期间提供了男性伴侣的联系信息。在测试咨询风险评估中,许多男人没有充分报告其性伴侣的性别;这表明点击率数据可能无法完全捕捉客户的风险行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号