首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >The prevalence of low income among childbearing women in California: implications for the private and public sectors.
【2h】

The prevalence of low income among childbearing women in California: implications for the private and public sectors.

机译:加利福尼亚州育龄妇女中低收入的流行:对私营和公共部门的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the income distribution of childbearing women in California and sought to identify income groups at increased risk of untimely prenatal care. METHODS: A 1994/95 cross-sectional statewide survey of 10,132 postpartum women was used. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of all childbearing women had low income (0%-200% of the federal poverty level), and 46% were poor (0%-100% of the federal poverty level). Thirty-five percent of women with private prenatal coverage had low income. Most low-income women with Medi-Cal (California's Medicaid) or private coverage received their prenatal care at private-sector sites. Compared with women with incomes over 400% of the poverty level, both poor and near-poor women were at significantly elevated risk of untimely care after adjustment for insurance, education, age, parity, marital status, and ethnicity (adjusted odds ratios = 5.32 and 3.09, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study's results indicate that low-income women are the mainstream maternity population, not a "special needs" subgroup; even among privately insured childbearing women, a substantial proportion have low income. Efforts to increase timely prenatal care initiation cannot focus solely on women with Medicaid, the uninsured, women in absolute poverty, or those who receive care at public-sector sites.
机译:目的:本研究调查了加利福尼亚州育龄妇女的收入分布,并试图找出收入高的人群,这些人群的产前保健不及时风险增加。方法:采用1994/95年全州10132名产后妇女横断面调查。结果:所有生育妇女中有65%为低收入(占联邦贫困线的0%-200%),有46%为贫困(占联邦贫困线的0%-100%)。有私人产前保险的女性中有35%的收入较低。具有Medi-Cal(加利福尼亚州的Medicaid)或私人保险的大多数低收入妇女在私人机构接受了产前检查。与收入超过贫困线400%的妇女相比,在调整了保险,教育,年龄,均等,婚姻状况和种族之后,贫穷和近乎贫穷的妇女都面临着得不到及时护理的风险显着升高(调整后的优势比= 5.32)和3.09)。结论:本研究结果表明,低收入妇女是孕产妇的主流,而不是“特殊需要”亚组。即使在有私人保险的生育妇女中,很大一部分人的收入也很低。加大及时及时进行产前护理的努力不能仅仅集中在有医疗补助的妇女,没有保险的妇女,绝对贫困的妇女或在公共场所接受治疗的妇女。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号