首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Health >Community Engagement Compared With Technical Assistance to Disseminate Depression Care Among Low-Income, Minority Women: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Study
【2h】

Community Engagement Compared With Technical Assistance to Disseminate Depression Care Among Low-Income, Minority Women: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Study

机译:社区参与与技术援助在低收入少数族裔妇女中开展抑郁症治疗的比较:一项随机对照的有效性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of a (CEP) versus a technical assistance approach (Resources for Services, or RS) to disseminate depression care for low-income ethnic minority women.Methods. We conducted secondary analyses of intervention effects for largely low-income, minority women subsample (n = 595; 45.1% Latino and 45.4% African American) in a matched, clustered, randomized control trial conducted in 2 low-resource communities in Los Angeles, California, between 2010 and 2012. Outcomes assessed included mental health, socioeconomic factors, and service use at 6- and 12-month follow-up.Results. Although we found no intervention difference for depressive symptoms, there were statistically significant effects for mental health quality of life, resiliency, homelessness risk, and financial difficulties at 6 months, as well as missed work days, self-efficacy, and care barriers at 12 months favoring CEP relative to RS. CEP increased use of outpatient substance abuse services and faith-based depression visits at 6 months.Conclusions. Engaging health care and social community programs may offer modest improvements on key functional and socioeconomic outcomes, reduce care barriers, and increase engagement in alternative depression services for low-income, predominantly ethnic minority women.
机译:目标。为了比较(CEP)与技术援助方法(服务资源或RS)的有效性,以向低收入少数民族妇女传播抑郁症护理。我们在洛杉矶的2个低资源社区进行了一项配对,分组,随机对照试验,对主要为低收入,少数族裔女性子样本(n = 595,占45.1%的拉丁裔和45.4%的非裔美国人)的干预效果进行了二次分析。加利福尼亚,2010年至2012年。在6个月和12个月的随访中评估的结果包括心理健康,社会经济因素和服务使用情况。尽管我们发现抑郁症状的干预措施无差异,但对6个月时的心理健康生活质量,韧性,无家可归风险和财务困难以及12天的误工,自我效能和护理障碍有统计学意义的影响。相对于RS,有利于CEP的月份。 CEP在6个月时增加了门诊药物滥用服务和基于信仰的抑郁症就诊的使用。参与医疗保健和社会社区计划可能会在关键的功能和社会经济成果方面取得适度的改善,减少护理障碍,并增加对低收入,主要是少数民族妇女的替代性抑郁症服务的参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号