首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica >Water sorption and solubility of polyamide denture base materials
【2h】

Water sorption and solubility of polyamide denture base materials

机译:聚酰胺义齿基料的吸水率和溶解度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: Some patients experience adverse reactions to poly(methyl methacrylate)-based (PMMA) dentures. Polyamide (PA) as an alternative to PMMA has, however, not been well documented with regard to water sorption and water solubility. The aim of this in vitro study was to measure water sorption and water solubility of two PA materials compared with PMMA, and to evaluate the major components released from the PA materials and the effect on hardness of the materials. >Methods: Ten discs (40.0 mm diameter, 2.0 mm thick) of each material (PA: Valplast and Breflex; PMMA: SR Ivocap HIP) were prepared according to manufacturers’ recommendations. The specimens were tested for water sorption and water solubility, according to a modification of ISO 20795-1:2008. Released substances were analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). >Results: There were statistically significant differences among the materials regarding water sorption, water solubility and time to water saturation. Breflex had the highest water sorption (30.4 μg/mm3), followed by PMMA-material (25.8 μg/mm3) and Valplast (13.6 μg/mm3). Both PA materials had statistically significant lower water solubility than the PMMA. Both PA had a net increase in weight. Analysis by GC/MS identified release of the compound 12-aminododecanolactam from the material Valplast. No release was found from the Breflex material. >Conclusions: The PA denture materials show differences in water sorption and solubility, but within the limits of the standard requirements. The PA showed a net increase in weight after long-term water sorption. The clinical implications of the findings are not elucidated.
机译:>目的:部分患者对基于聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)的假牙产生不良反应。然而,关于吸水率和水溶性,聚酰胺(PA)作为PMMA的替代品尚未得到充分证明。这项体外研究的目的是测量两种PA材料与PMMA相比的吸水率和水溶性,并评估PA材料释放的主要成分以及对材料硬度的影响。 >方法:根据制造商的建议,准备了每种材料(PA:Valplast和Breflex; PMMA:SR Ivocap HIP)的十个圆盘(直径40.0 mm,厚度2.0 mm)。根据ISO 20795-1:2008的修改,对样品进行了吸水率和水溶性测试。通过气相色谱/质谱(GC / MS)分析释放的物质。 >结果:材料之间的吸水率,水溶性和饱和时间均存在统计学差异。 Breflex的吸水率最高(30.4μg/ mm 3 ),其次是PMMA材料(25.8μg/ mm 3 )和Valplast(13.6μg/ mm ) 3 )。在统计学上,两种PA材料的水溶性均低于PMMA。两个PA的重量净增加。通过GC / MS分析确定了化合物12-氨基十二烷内酰胺从Valplast材料中释放。从Breflex材料中未发现释放。 >结论:PA义齿材料的吸水率和溶解度存在差异,但在标准要求范围内。长期吸水后,PA的重量净增加。研究结果的临床意义尚未阐明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号