首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AAPS PharmSci >Performance of Methods for Handling Missing Categorical Covariate Data in Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses
【2h】

Performance of Methods for Handling Missing Categorical Covariate Data in Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses

机译:在群体药代动力学分析中处理缺失的分类协变量数据的方法的性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In population pharmacokinetic analyses, missing categorical data are often encountered. We evaluated several methods of performing covariate analyses with partially missing categorical covariate data. Missing data methods consisted of discarding data (DROP), additional effect parameter for the group with missing data (EXTRA), and mixture methods in which the mixing probability was fixed to the observed fraction of categories (MIXobs), based on the likelihood of the concentration data (MIXconc), or combined likelihood of observed covariate data and concentration data (MIXjoint). Simulations were implemented to study bias and imprecision of the methods in datasets with equal-sized and unbalanced category ratios for a binary covariate as well as datasets with non-random missingness (MNAR). Additionally, the performance and feasibility of implementation was assessed in two real datasets. At either low (10%) or high (50%) levels of missingness, all methods performed similarly well. Performance was similar for situations with unbalanced datasets (3:1 covariate distribution) and balanced datasets. In the MNAR scenario, the MIX methods showed a higher bias in the estimation of CL and covariate effect than EXTRA. All methods could be applied to real datasets, except DROP. All methods perform similarly at the studied levels of missingness, but the DROP and EXTRA methods provided less bias than the mixture methods in the case of MNAR. However, EXTRA was associated with inflated type I error rates of covariate selection, while DROP handled data inefficiently.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9373-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:在人群药代动力学分析中,经常会遇到缺少分类数据的情况。我们评估了使用部分缺失的分类协变量数据执行协变量分析的几种方法。数据丢失的方法包括丢弃数据(DROP),数据丢失的组的附加效果参数(EXTRA)和混合方法,其中混合概率根据观察到的类别概率固定为观察到的类别部分(MIXobs)浓度数据(MIXconc),或观察到的协变量数据和浓度数据的组合可能性(MIXjoint)。进行了模拟研究,以研究具有相同大小和不平衡类别比率的二元协变量数据集以及具有非随机缺失(MNAR)数据集的方法的偏倚和不精确性。此外,在两个实际数据集中评估了实施的性能和可行性。在缺少程度较低(10%)或较高(50%)的情况下,所有方法的表现均相似。对于不平衡数据集(3:1协变量分布)和平衡数据集的情况,性能相似。在MNAR方案中,MIX方法在CL和协变量效应的估计中比EXTRA显示出更高的偏差。除DROP之外,所有方法都可以应用于实际数据集。在研究的缺失水平上,所有方法的性能相似,但是对于MNAR,DROP和EXTRA方法提供的偏差要小于混合方法。但是,EXTRA与协变量选择的虚假I型错误率相关,而DROP处理数据效率低下。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1208 / s12248-012-9373-2)包含补充材料,可用于授权用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号