首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AAPS PharmSci >In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Amorphous Solid Dispersions Generated by Different Bench-Scale Processes Using Griseofulvin as a Model Compound
【2h】

In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Amorphous Solid Dispersions Generated by Different Bench-Scale Processes Using Griseofulvin as a Model Compound

机译:使用灰黄霉素作为模型化合物体外和体内评估不同工作台规模过程产生的非晶态固体分散体

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Drug polymer-based amorphous solid dispersions (ASD) are widely used in the pharmaceutical industry to improve bioavailability for poorly water-soluble compounds. Spray-drying is the most common process involved in the manufacturing of ASD material. However, spray-drying involves a high investment of material quantity and time. Lower investment manufacturing processes such as fast evaporation and freeze-drying (lyophilization) have been developed to manufacture ASD at the bench level. The general belief is that the overall performance of ASD material is thermodynamically driven and should be independent of the manufacturing process. However, no formal comparison has been made to assess the in vivo performance of material generated by different processes. This study compares the in vitro and in vivo properties of ASD material generated by fast evaporation, lyophilization, and spray-drying methods using griseofulvin as a model compound and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate as the polymer matrix. Our data suggest that despite minor differences in the formulation release properties and stability of the ASD materials, the overall exposure is comparable between the three manufacturing processes under the conditions examined. These results suggest that fast evaporation and lyophilization may be suitable to generate ASD material for oral evaluation. However, caution should be exercised since the general applicability of the present findings will need to be further evaluated.
机译:基于药物聚合物的无定形固体分散体(ASD)已广泛用于制药行业,以提高水溶性差的化合物的生物利用度。喷雾干燥是ASD材料制造中最常见的过程。但是,喷雾干燥涉及材料数量和时间的大量投资。已经开发出了诸如快速蒸发和冷冻干燥(冻干)之类的投资较低的制造工艺,以在工作台上制造ASD。人们普遍认为,ASD材料的整体性能是由热力学驱动的,并且应独立于制造工艺。然而,尚未进行正式的比较来评估由不同过程产生的材料的体内性能。这项研究比较了使用灰黄霉素作为模型化合物,羟丙基甲基纤维素乙酸琥珀酸酯作为聚合物基质,通过快速蒸发,冻干和喷雾干燥方法产生的ASD材料的体外和体内特性。我们的数据表明,尽管在配方释放特性和ASD材料的稳定性方面存在细微差别,但在所考察的条件下,三种制造工艺的总暴露量是可比的。这些结果表明,快速蒸发和冻干可能适用于生成ASD材料进行口服评估。但是,应谨慎行事,因为需要进一步评估本研究结果的一般适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号