首页> 外文期刊>世界急诊医学杂志(英文) >How to secure the connection between thoracostomy tube and drainage system?
【24h】

How to secure the connection between thoracostomy tube and drainage system?

机译:如何确保胸腔造口管和引流系统之间的连接?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Thoracostomy tube insertion is one of the common bedside procedures in emergency medicine and many acute specialties. Dislodgement of thoracostomy tube from the connection tube of chest drainage system is an important problem with potential complications such as contamination, infection and pneumothorax. Besides, mere loosening can also lead to malfunction. It is a common practice to tape the connection of the system. This study aimed to evaluate the materials and methods of connection of chest drain system to minimize drainage dislodgement. METHODS: We conducted an experimental study to assess the tightness of the connection with various taping materials and methods. We selected three commonly used adhesive materials (3M?Transpore? Medical tape, 3M? Micropore? Medical tape, 3M? Soft Cloth Tape on Liner) and three different methods (cross method, straight method, nylon band) to secure the junction between the thoracostomy tube and the bi-conical adaptor in the drainage system. The measured outcome was the weight causing visible loosening of the junction between thoracotomy tube and the adaptor. RESULTS: For each taping material and taping method, 10 trials were performed. The median weight required to disconnect the junction is 26.22 lb for Transpore?, 31.29 lb for Micropore? and 32.44 lb for Soft Cloth Tape on Liner. A smaller force was required to disconnect if Transpore? is used (P<0.001). There was no statistical significant difference between Micropore? and Soft Cloth Tape on Liner (P=0.98). The median disconnecting force is 32.44 lb for straight taping method, 40.55 lb for cross taping method and 21.15 lb for plastic band. The cross-taping method was the more secure method (P<0.0001 when compared with plastic band) (P=0.033 when compared with straight method). CONCLUSION: Cross-taping is the most secure method among the tested varieties in connecting the thoracostomy tube to the chest drainage system. Transpore? is not a recommended material for thoracostomy tube taping.
机译:背景:胸腔镜置管术是急诊医学和许多急性专科中常见的床旁手术之一。从胸腔引流系统的连接管上移开胸造口管是一个潜在的重要问题,可能会引起并发症,例如污染,感染和气胸。此外,仅松动也可能导致故障。磁带连接系统是一种常见的做法。这项研究旨在评估连接胸腔引流系统的材料和方法,以最大程度地减少引流。方法:我们进行了一项实验研究,以评估与各种胶带材料和方法的连接的紧密度。我们选择了三种常用的粘合材料(3M?Transpore?医用胶带,3M?Micropore?医用胶带,3M?衬里软布胶带)和三种不同的方法(交叉法,直管法,尼龙带)来确保两者之间的连接。胸腔切开术管和引流系统中的双锥形接头。测得的结果是重量,导致开胸管和适配器之间的连接处明显松动。结果:对于每种编带材料和编带方法,进行了10次试验。 Transpore?断开连接所需的中位重量为26.22 lb,Micropore?为31.29lb。衬垫上的软布胶带为32.44磅。如果需要Transpore,需要较小的力量才能断开连接?使用(P <0.001)。微孔之间没有统计学差异。衬垫上的软布胶带(P = 0.98)。直型编带方法的中位断开力为32.44 lb,交叉编带方法的中位断开力为40.55 lb,塑料带为21.15lb。交叉打孔法是更安全的方法(与塑料带相比,P <0.0001)(与直式方法相比,P = 0.033)。结论:在将经胸腔造口管连接到胸腔引流系统上,交叉绑扎是最安全的方法。透孔?不推荐将其用于胸腔造瘘管的包扎材料。

著录项

  • 来源
    《世界急诊医学杂志(英文)》 |2014年第004期|259-263|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Pok Oi Hospital, Au Tau, Yuen Long, Hong Kong, China;

    Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Pok Oi Hospital, Au Tau, Yuen Long, Hong Kong, China;

    Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, China;

    Clinical Skills Training Centre, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, China;

    Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Pok Oi Hospital, Au Tau, Yuen Long, Hong Kong, China;

    Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Pok Oi Hospital, Au Tau, Yuen Long, Hong Kong, China;

    Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Pok Oi Hospital, Au Tau, Yuen Long, Hong Kong, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 04:13:13
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号