首页> 中文期刊> 《护理实践与研究》 >口腔科诊疗室三种消毒方法的效果比较

口腔科诊疗室三种消毒方法的效果比较

         

摘要

目的:探讨口腔科诊疗室三种消毒方法的效果.方法:对我院口腔科30间诊疗室分别采用紫外线灯照射、95%酒精浸泡过的苍术熏蒸、空气净化除菌机进行消毒,分别取消毒前、消毒后1,2,3h的空气菌落数进行分析.结果:三种消毒方法在消毒后1h均有效,空气净化除菌机消毒效果最好,紫外线消毒效果其次,苍术熏蒸效果最差;2 h后紫外线消毒失效,空气净化除菌机及苍术熏蒸仍有效;3 h后苍术熏蒸也失效,仅空气净化除菌机仍有效.结论:空气净化机连续消毒效果最好,95%酒精浸泡苍术熏蒸的连续消毒效果比紫外线消毒要稍持久.%Objective:To investigate the effect of three disinfection methods in dental clinic.Methods:Our hospital department of stomatology 30 clinic re spectively by ultraviolet irradiation,95% alcohol soaked rhizoma atractylodis fumigation,disinfection of air purification sterilization machine.Canceled before disinfection poison,after 0,1,2,3 h air colony number analysis.Results:Three kinds of disinfection methods in disinfection of 0,1 h were effective,the effect of air purification machine disinfection and sterilization was Dthe best,followed by the ultraviolet disinfection effect,thizoma atractylodis fumigation effect was the worst.Failure after 2 h of ultraviolet disinfection,air purification sterilizing machine and rhizoma atractylodis fumigation was still effective; after 3 h of Rhizoma Atractylodis fumigation also failure,only air purification sterilization the machine was still effective.Conclusion:The air purification machine continuous disinfection effect is the best,continuous disinfection effect of 95% alcohol immersion Rhizoma Atractylodis fumigation to slightly longer than ultraviolet disinfection.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号