首页> 外文期刊>中国神经再生研究(英文版) >Alternation in F-wave parameters of median nerve from unaffected extremity in stroke patients with hemiplegia under dynamic state
【24h】

Alternation in F-wave parameters of median nerve from unaffected extremity in stroke patients with hemiplegia under dynamic state

机译:动态状态下偏瘫脑卒中患者未受影响肢体正中神经的F波参数变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: For many years, the extremities of stroke patients are divided into affected side and unaffected side according to clinical symptoms and body signs. Moreover, previous rehabilitation function training is developed simply aiming to the dysfunction manifested by unaffected extremity. Problems of unaffected extremity are always ignored, such as left- and right- side connection dysfunction, abnormal muscular tension of unaffected side and so on.OBJECTIVE: To observe neurophysiological change characteristics of unaffected extremity of stroke patients with hemiplegia by electromyographical method.DESIGN: Case-control observation.SETTING: First Hospital, Jilin University.PARTICIPANTS: Eighty stroke patients with hemiplegia confirmed by skull CT or MRI, who firstly hospitalized in the Department of Neurology, First Hospital, Jilin University between July 2004 and March 2005, were retrieved. They were scored > 8 points in Glasgow Coma Scale and had stable vital sign. Nineteen normal persons who received healthy examination in the clinic were involved in normal control group. Following the classification criteria of Brunnstrom's Recovery Stages of Stroke (BRSS), 80 stroke patients with hemiplegia were assigned into 3 groups: BRSS Ⅰ -Ⅱ group (n =36), BRSS Ⅲ-Ⅳ group (n =23) and BRSSⅤ-Ⅵ (n=21).METHODS: F-wave parameters of median nerve of unaffected extremity were detected by electromyographical technique. The recording electrode (muscular belly of abductor pollicis brevis) and reference electrode (first finger bone) were connected with grounding electrode. Stimulating electrode was placed in the median part of wrist joint with stimulation intensity of 130% that of threshold stimulation, stimulation frequency of 2 Hz, current pulse width of 0.2 ms, time course of 5 ms and sensitivity of 2 mV. The F-wave of median nerve of affected extremity under the resting stage (static status) and that of unaffected extremity under the maximum resistant contracted state were detected in order. The amplitude and appearance percentage of F wave were recorded.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of F-wave parameters of median nerve between the unaffected extremity of stroke patients with hemiplegia and the extremity of control subjects under different status.RESULTS: All the patients accomplished the detection, and all of them participated in the final analysis. ①Under dynamic status, the amplitude and appearance percentage of F wave of unaffected extremity of patients in BRSS Ⅲ-Ⅳ group were significantly higher than those in the normal control group, respectively [(0.803 9±0.157 3) mV vs. (0.406 7±0.170 3) mV; (0.856 1±0.266 8)% vs. (0.650 0±0.197 6)%, P< 0.05]. Under static status, there were no significant differences in F-wave parameters of median nerve in the unaffected extremity of patients between BRSS Ⅰ -Ⅱ group and BRSS Ⅴ-Ⅵ group (P> 0.05). ②F-wave parameters of median nerve of unaffected extremity of patients in BRSS Ⅰ - Ⅱ group and BRSS Ⅴ -Ⅵ group under dynamic statewere higher than those under static status, without significant difference (P>0.05),while the amplitude and appearance percentage of F wave of median nerve of unaffected extremity of patients in BRSS Ⅲ- Ⅳ group under dynamic statewere significantly higher than those under static state [(0.803 9±0.157 3) mV vs.(0.391 7±0.131 6) mV; (0.856 1±0.266 8 )% vs.(0.639 1 ±0.259 4)%,P< 0.05]. ③ There was no significant difference in F wave parameters among groups under static state(P>0.05). However, under dynamic status,the amplitude and appearance percentage of F wave parameters of median nerve of unaffected extremity of patients in BRSS Ⅲ-Ⅳ group [(0.803 9±0.157 3) mV, (0.856 1±0.266 8)%] were significantly lower than those in the other two groups [(0.395 1±0.1488),(0.437 1±0.157 6) mV;(0.612 5±0.232 8)%,(0.657 1±0.232 5)%,P< 0.05].CONCLUSION: With the development of disease condition and the increase of muscular tension at anesthetic side, combination motor of affected extremity is caused following movement and muscular tension enhances to non-anesthetic-side. Therefore, F-wave parameters increase under dynamic status.
机译:背景:多年来,卒中患者的四肢根据临床症状和身体标志分为受影响的侧面和不受影响的一面。此外,先前的康复函数培训是仅仅旨在旨在表现出不受影响的极端的功能障碍。不受影响的肢体问题总是被忽视,如左侧和右侧的连接功能障碍,不受影响的侧面的异常肌肉张力,依照。通过电拍摄方法观察脑卒中患者未受影响患者未受影响肢体的神经生理变化特征。设计:案例控制观察。吉林大学第一医院。Paripants:80岁的偏瘫或MRI证实的偏瘫患者,他们在2004年7月至2005年7月至2005年3月至2005年3月之间首次住院,首次住院,他们首次住院,吉林大学。 。他们被评分>格拉斯哥昏迷队的8分,并具有稳定的生命体征。在临床中接受健康检查的19个正常人参与了正常对照组。在Brunnstrom恢复阶段的分类标准(BRSS)的恢复阶段,将80例偏瘫患者分配为3组:BRSSⅠ-Ⅱ组(n = 36),BRSSⅢ-α组(n = 23)和BRSSⅴ-ⅵ (n = 21)。方法:通过电磁技术检测不受影响的肢体中位神经的F波参数。记录电极(Abductor Pollicis Brevis的肌肉腹部)和参比电极(第一指状物)与接地电极连接。将刺激电极置于腕关节的中位数,刺激强度为130%的阈值刺激,刺激频率为2 Hz,电流脉冲宽度为0.2ms,时间过程为5ms,灵敏度为2 mV。在静止阶段(静态状态)下受影响末端的中位神经的F波,按顺序检测到最大抗性收缩状态下的不受影响的末端。记录F波的幅度和外观百分比。结果措施:在不同状态下卒中患者未受影响的肢体与不同状态下对照对象肢体之间的中位神经之间的F波参数的比较。结果:所有患者都完成了检测,所有这些都参与了最终分析。 ①动态状态下,BRSSⅢ-Ⅴ组患者未受影响的极端F波的幅度和外观分别高于正常对照组的幅度[(0.803 9±0.157 3)MV(0.406 7± 0.170 3)MV; (0.856 1±0.266 8)%Vs.(0.650 0±0.197 6)%,P <0.05]。在静态状态下,BRSSⅠ-Ⅱ组患者未受影响的极端中位神经的F波参数没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。 ②BRSSⅠ-Ⅱ组患者未受影响的极端中位神经中位神经的波浪参数高于静态状态下的动态状态下的BRSSⅴⅴ组,没有显着差异(p> 0.05),幅度和外观百分比FBRSSⅢ-Ⅳ组患者未受影响的末端的中位神经中位神经中位神经,明显高于静态(0.803 9±0.157 3)MV与(0.391 7±0.131 6)MV; (0.8561±0.266 8)%Vs.(0.639 1±0.259 4)%,P <0.05]。 ③静态下群体中的F波参数没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。然而,在动态状态下,BRSSⅢ-Ⅴ组患者未受影响的极端不受影响的神经中位数的F波参数的幅度和外观百分比[(0.803 9±0.157 3)MV,(0.856 1±0.266 8)%]显着低于另外两组的那些[(0.395 1±0.1488),(0.437 1±0.157 6)MV;(0.612 5±0.232 8)%,(0.657 1±0.232 5)%,P <0.05]。结论:随着疾病状况的发展和麻醉侧肌肉张力的增加,受影响末端的组合电动机在运动和肌肉张力增加到非麻醉方面引起。因此,F波参数在动态状态下增加。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中国神经再生研究(英文版)》 |2006年第9期|806-808|共3页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Cadre, First Hospital, Jilin University,Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China;

    Department of Neurology, First Hospital, Jilin University,Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China;

    Department of Neurology, First Hospital, Jilin University,Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China;

    Department of Neurology, First Hospital, Jilin University,Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China;

    Department of Neurology, First Hospital, Jilin University,Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类 神经病学与精神病学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:44:52
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号