首页> 外文期刊>中国神经再生研究(英文版) >Modified big bone valve decompression reduces intracranial pressure and improves prognosis following craniocerebral injury
【24h】

Modified big bone valve decompression reduces intracranial pressure and improves prognosis following craniocerebral injury

机译:改良大骨瓣减压可降低颅内压并改善颅脑损伤后的预后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Conventional big bone valve decompression is used for treatment of craniocerebral injury, but postoperative therapeutic effects are not ideal in some patients. Therefore, a better method of big bone valve decompression should be searched.OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of modified standard big bone valve decompression on craniocerebral injury.DESIGN: A controlled observation experiment.SETTING: Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital Affiliated to Lanzhou University. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight patients with craniocerebral injury admitted to Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital Affiliated to Lanzhou University from October 1998 to October 2001 were involved in this experiment. The involved patients, including 60 male and 28 female, aged 16 to 67 years, were confirmed as craniocerebral injury by skull CT and MRI examination. They are all in the treatment range of standard big bone valve decompression. Informed consents of operation items were obtained from all the patients. The involved patients were randomized into modified operation group (n =48) and conventional operation group (n =40). METHODS: ①In the modified operation group, bone valve was removed as big as possible. Bone valve was properly enlarged near the base of skull and sphenoidal crest was removed; Periosteum was reserved as possible. Dura mater was cut from the center of bone window to peripheral area in the shape radiation; When temporalis was sewed up, its fascia would be separated from its root and the scalp cut would be sewed up layer and layer. After hematoma and injured brain tissue were cleared away, the cut dura matter in the shape of radiation covered the brain surface again. Dura mater was not sewed up, and the uncovered brain tissue was covered with gelatin sponge. Subepicranial aponeurosis was bluntly dissected along the peripheral edge of incision. The lower part of epicranical aponeurasis , with a width of 3 - 5 cm, was bluntly dissected along the peripheral edge of incision, which was for loosing the tension of scalp and sewing it. ②In the conventional operation group, standard big bone valve decompression was performed in all the patients, and intracranial pressure was monitored. At postoperative 3, 5, 7 and 15 days, intracranial pressure of patients in two groups was measured. Meanwhile, prognosis of patients in two groups were compared and analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of intracranial pressure and prognosis of patients between two groups at postoperative different time points.RESULTS: Eighty-eight involved patients with craniocerebral injury participated in the final analysis. ①At postoperative 3, 5, 7 and 15 days, intracranial pressure of patients in the modified operation group was (2.39±0.53), (2.13±0.53), (1.86±0.53) kPa, which was significantly lower than that in the conventional operation group [ (2.66±0.53), (2.39±0.66), (2.13±0.53) kPa, P < 0.01]. ②In the conventional operation group, 8 (17%) patients died, 3 (6%) patients presented vegetative state, which was respectively less than that in the conventional operation group [4 (10%) and 3(6%), P < 0.01]; In the conventional operation group, 6(13%) and 3(6%) patients suffered from moderate and severe disability, respectively, which was significantly less than that in the conventional operation group [4 (10%) ,5 (12%) ,P<0.01], 12(26%) and 16 (35%) patients suffered from mild disability and turned better, respectively, which was more than that in the conventional operation group [6 (15%), 13 (32%), P < 0.01].CONCLUSION: Modified big bone valve decompression fundamentally changes from conventional big bone valve decompression. It fully decompresses and improves prognosis of patients.
机译:背景:传统的大骨阀减压用于治疗颅脑损伤,但术后治疗效果在某些患者中并不理想。因此,应搜索更好的大骨阀解压缩方法。目的:观察改性标准大骨瓣减压对颅脑损伤的影响。指导:受控观察实验。兰州大学附属第一医院神经外科部。参与者:1998年10月至2001年10月至2001年10月,兰州大学附属第一医院纳入神经外科患者的八十八名颅脑损伤患者参与了这一实验。涉及的患者,包括60名男性和28名女性,年龄在16至67岁,被颅骨CT和MRI检查被证实为颅脑损伤。它们都在标准大骨阀减压的治疗范围内。知情同意运营项目是从所有患者获得的。涉及的患者被随机分为修饰的操作组(n = 48)和常规操作组(n = 40)。方法:①改性操作组,尽可能大的骨阀。骨阀在颅底附近被正确放大,并散发出螺纹嵴;骨膜保留尽可能。将Dura Mater从骨窗中心切割成形状辐射的周边区域;当颞下缝制时,它的筋膜将与根部分开,头皮切割将被缝制层和层。血肿和受伤的脑组织被清除后,辐射形状的切割硬质物质再次覆盖了大脑表面。 Dura Mater没有缝制,并用明胶海绵覆盖未覆盖的脑组织。沿着切口的周边边缘钝化潜伏的腱膜。宽度为3-5厘米的表皮腱膜的下部沿着切口的周边边缘分裂,这是为了减少头皮和缝制它的张力。 ②在传统的操作组中,在所有患者中进行标准大骨阀减压,并监测颅内压。在术后3,5,7和15天,测量两组患者的颅内压。同时,比较了两组患者的预后和分析。主要观察措施:术后两组患者颅内压力和预后的比较。结果:八十八个涉及颅脑损伤患者参加了最终分析。 ①术后3,5,7和15天,改性操作组患者的颅内压(2.39±0.53),(2.13±0.53),(1.86±0.53)KPA,显着低于传统操作组[(2.66±0.53),(2.39±0.66),(2.13±0.53)KPA,P <0.01]。 ②常规操作组,8名(17%)患者死亡,3例(6%)患者呈现植物态,分别小于常规操作组[4(10%)和3(6%),P < 0.01]在常规操作组中,6(13%)和3名(6%)患者分别患有中度和严重的残疾,其显着低于常规操作组[4(10%),5(12%) ,P <0.01],12(26%)和16名(35%)患者患有轻度残疾,分别变得更好,其比常规操作组更好[6(15%),13(32%) ,P <0.01]。结论:改进的大骨阀减压从传统的大骨阀减压的根本改变。它完全减压并提高了患者的预后。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中国神经再生研究(英文版)》 |2007年第5期|318-320|共3页
  • 作者

    Xinzhong Wen; Leiming Huo;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital Affiliated to Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China;

    Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital Affiliated to Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类 神经病学与精神病学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:44:49
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号