Identifying prognostic factors for conservative treatment outcomes in servicemen with chronic exertional compartment syndrome treated at a rehabilitation center

摘要

Background:Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS)is a condition of pain induced by exercise,and it is characterized by muscle swelling and impaired muscle function in the lower leg.Given the diversity in the diagnosis and treatment of CECS,it is desirable to determine variables pertaining to prognosis and recovery.The purpose of this study is to identify prognostic factors for conservative treatment outcomes in servicemen with CECS who were treated at a Military Rehabilitation Center. Methods:Patients from all military services were referred from the special unit for lower leg pain at the Central Military Hospital,Utrecht,the Netherlands.Descriptive analysis was used to report the characteristics of the participants and their baseline measurements.Group differences were analyzed using a Student''''s t-test or Mannwhitney U test,according to the normality of the data distribution.Differences between the pre-and post- intervention outcomes were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.To evaluate the magnitude of prognostic factors,a univariate logistic regression analysis was performed.The prognostic factors included age,body mass index, body fat percentage,self-efficacy beliefs,foot malalignment,intramuscular pressure,other comorbidities,protein and creatine use,smoking,alcohol use,complaint duration,physical demands,and duration of military service.Results:After the rehabilitation period,we observed 25 patients with a successful outcome,which was defined as a reduction in pain (≥2 points)during the capacity test measured using a verbal rating scale and 20 patients with an unsuccessful outcome.Factors demonstrating a limited increased odds ratio for an unsuccessful outcome included smoking,alcohol use,intramuscular pressure,a complaint duration of more than 6 months,and physical demands of service.However,these factors did not reach significance. Conclusion:This study did not identify any prognostic factors that predict the outcome of a rehabilitation program for CECS.A larger sample using an identical design might provide further evidence regarding prognostic factors, which would facilitate development of a model that predicts the outcomes of a rehabilitation program for CECS.