中科院院士与诺贝尔生理学或医学奖获得者获奖前SCI论文比较

摘要

分析中科院院士和诺贝尔生理学或医学奖获得者获奖前S、I论文的被引次数、合作率与合作网络的节点中心度,比较二者SCI论文的质量和合作情况.结果显示,中科院院士少量S、I论文被引次数达到后者获奖前SCI论文的前1％水平,但整体被引水平明显偏低;个体和机构合作率较高,闭队局部合作水平与后者相当,但合作模式不同;生物化学与分子生物学和神经科学等学科方向为二者共同关注,中科院院士对应用或应用基础学科关注较多.提示中科院院士SCI论文质量相对较低,尤缺高水平原创性成果;科研合作已成主要研究范式,但需要优化合作模式等.%By analyzing citation frequency,cooperation rate and node's centrality index of scientific cooperation network,a comparative assessment of SCI papers of Academicians Chinese Academy of Sciences (ACAS) and laureates of Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine beforeawarding.The study results showed that the overall level of citation frequency of the SCI papers of ACAS was lower than that of laureates of Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine before awarding,althougb there were a few SCI papers of ACAS ranked to the top 1 ％ SCI papers.Meanwhile,comparing with the same level of local cooperation rate,the individual and institutional cooperation rates of ACAS were higher than that of the laureates of Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine before awarding.However,both of the two groups took different cooperation models.Biochemistry and molecular biology,neuroscience and other disciplines had been the same focuses attracted attentions of the two groups of scientists.In addition,ACAS had paid more attentions to applied disciplines or applied basic disciplines.In summary,the SCI papers of ACAS were of lower quality and lack of high level original work.With the researeh eoopcration becoming the main research paradigm,ACAS should explore the optimized models of research cooperation.