《中国文献编目规则》和RDA对电子资源著录的异同分析

摘要

Through comparing the general material designation, the resource type and number item, the physical description item, annotations, standard numbers of Chinese Bibliographical Cataloguing Rules and Resource Description and Access(RDA), we could find out that electronic resource description items are much more, the provision is more specific, contents is richer in RDA, which reflects that RDA is not only suitable to the description of traditional types of literatures, but also to the electronic resource. RDA replacing AACR2 is the trend. Chinese Bibliographical Cataloguing Rules should adapt to the change of literature resource types and formats, and make change timely, in order to meet the need of the digital and internet age.%通过对《中国文献编目规则》和《资源描述与检索》（RDA）的一般文献类型标识、资源类型与数量项、载体形态项、附注、标准编号5个方面的对比分析发现，RDA关于数字资源著录的条款更多，规定更具体，内容更丰富，体现出RDA不仅适用于传统类型文献的著录，更能适用于电子资源这一文献类型的著录。RDA取代AACR2是大势所趋，《中国文献编目规则》也应顺应文献资源种类和格式变化的要求，适时作出修改，以满足数字时代和网络时代的需求。