首页> 外文期刊>农业科学学报(英文版) >Analysis of Differences in Productivity, Proiftability and Soil Fertility Between Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems in the Tropics and Sub-tropics
【24h】

Analysis of Differences in Productivity, Proiftability and Soil Fertility Between Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems in the Tropics and Sub-tropics

机译:热带和亚热带有机和常规作物系统之间的生产力,可繁殖性和土壤肥力差异分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Organic farming aims to stimulate soil fertility by avoiding the use of synthetic fertiliser inputs, relying instead on locally available natural resources. It is regarded by many as a sustainable alternative to conventional farming because it ensures higher biodiversity, restricts environmental pollution, prevents land degradation and is easy to apply for smallholder and subsistence farmers. Although widely practiced and studied in temperate regions, little is known about the potential overall beneifts of organic farming in the tropics and subtropics. This paper addresses this gap by undertaking an analysis of the differences between organic and conventional agriculture in the tropics and sub-tropics based on an extensive literature review including 88 papers with 458 data pairs. The comparison is based on three main indicators:yield, gross margin and soil organic carbon (SOC). The differences between the organic and conventional systems for each of these main indicators is represented by the ratio of the value of the indicator in the organic system divided by the corresponding value in the conventional system. This was initially calculated for each data pair individually, and grouped by a variety of explanatory factors, such as precipitation, human development level, soil texture, crop type, organic input type, time after conversion and certiifcation. The results demonstrate that under organic management, yields were on average 26%higher, gross margins 51%higher and soil organic carbon 53%higher than under conventional management. The highest yield increases in organic cropping systems were achieved in the least developed countries, in arid regions and on coarse soils. For gross margins, certiifcation was the main reason for differences between organic and conventional systems. Certiifed farmers, mostly located in developed countries, receive signiifcantly higher prices. Furthermore, organic farming in the driest regions results in higher proifts than in other regions. Even though soil organic carbon was signiifcantly higher overall under organic management, the results do not show signiifcant differences when grouped by the explanatory factors. They do however suggest that the highest carbon sequestration potential occurs in systems that had a high level of inputs, in regions with 1 000-1 500 mm of rainfall and on clayey soils.
机译:有机耕作的目的是通过避免使用合成肥料,而依靠当地可得的自然资源来刺激土壤肥力。由于它可以确保更高的生物多样性,限制环境污染,防止土地退化并且易于向小农户和自给自足的农民申请,因此被许多人视为传统农业的可持续替代方法。尽管在温带地区进行了广泛的实践和研究,但对热带和亚热带有机农业的潜在总体益处知之甚少。本文通过对包括88篇论文和458个数据对的大量文献进行了综述,对热带和亚热带地区有机农业与常规农业之间的差异进行了分析,以解决这一差距。比较是基于三个主要指标:产量,毛利率和土壤有机碳(SOC)。对于这些主要指标中的每一个,有机体系和常规体系之间的差异由有机体系中指标值除以常规体系中相应值的比率表示。最初是针对每个数据对分别计算得出的,然后根据各种解释性因素进行分组,例如降水,人类发育水平,土壤质地,作物类型,有机投入类型,转换和认证后的时间。结果表明,在有机管理下,单产平均比常规管理下高26%,毛利率高51%,土壤有机碳高53%。在最不发达国家,干旱地区和粗糙土壤上,有机种植系统的增产最高。就毛利率而言,认证是有机系统与传统系统之间差异的主要原因。多数位于发达国家的认证农民的价格明显提高。此外,最干旱地区的有机耕作比其他地区的耕作收益更高。尽管在有机管理下土壤有机碳总体上明显较高,但按解释性因素分组时,结果并未显示出显着差异。然而,他们的确暗示了最高的碳固存潜力发生在输入水平高的系统中,在降雨量为1000-1 500 mm的地区以及在粘性土壤上。

著录项

  • 来源
    《农业科学学报(英文版)》 |2014年第10期|2299-2310|共12页
  • 作者

    Te Pas CM; Rees RM;

  • 作者单位

    School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK;

    Carbon Management Centre, Scotland’s Rural College, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号