首页> 外文期刊>海南医科大学学报(英文版) >Effect of different anesthesia methods on irculation and stress reaction in patients underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery
【24h】

Effect of different anesthesia methods on irculation and stress reaction in patients underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery

机译:不同麻醉方法对妇科腹腔镜手术患者刺激和应激反应的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective:To observe the effect of different anesthesia methods on the circulation and stress reaction in patients underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery.Methods:A total of 120 gynecological patients who were admitted in our hospital from December, 2014 to October, 2015 for laparoscopic surgery were included in the study and randomized into group I, II, and III. The patients in the three groups were performed with the operation under CSEA, general anesthesia, and combined general-epidural-anesthesia, respectively. Non-invasive BP, HR, and ECG before anesthesia (T0), before pneumoperitoneum (T1), 10 min after pneumoperitoneum (T2), 20 min after pneumoperitoneum (T3), and 10 min after operation (T4) in the three groups were monitored. Blood was collected at T0, T3, and T4, respectively for blood gas examination. E, NE, and COS concentrations were detected.Results:HR at T2 in group I was significantly slow down (P<0.05), SBP and DBP were significantly reduced (P<0.05), and were significantly lower than those in group II and III (P<0.05), while the difference of SPO2 at each timing point was not significant (P>0.05). HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP at T2 and T3 in group II were significantly elevated (P<0.05). The difference of HR, SBP, DBP, and SPO2 at each timing point in group III was not significant (P>0.05). N, NE, and COS concentrations at T3 in group II were significantly elevated (P<0.05), and the difference of N, NE, and COS concentrations at T1 between group I and III was not significant (P>0.05). pH, PaCO2, and HCO3- at T3 and T4 in group I were significantly higher than those at T0 (P<0.05), PaCO2, and HCO3- at T3 in group I were significantly higher than those in group II and III (P<0.05), PaCO2 at T4 was significantly higher than that in group II and III (P<0.05). The difference of pH, PaCO2, and HCO3- at T0, T3, and T4 between group II and III was not significantly different (P>0.05).Conclusions:During the gynecological laparoscopic surgery, the three anesthesia methods can achieve a satisfactory anesthetic effect, but the combined general-epidural-anesthesia has a small effect on the blood pressure, respiration, and circulation, can alleviate the stress reaction, and maintain a favorable blood gas state; therefore, it should be preferred.
机译:目的:观察不同麻醉方法对妇科腹腔镜外科患者循环和应力反应的影响。方法:2014年12月至10月,2015年12月入院的120例妇科患者包括腹腔镜手术在研究中并随机分为I,II和III组。三组患者分别在CSEA,全身麻醉和联合一般硬膜外麻醉下进行。在麻醉前(T0)之前的无侵袭性BP,HR和ECG(T1),在气球(T2)后10分钟(T2),20分钟后肺胆管内(T3)后20分钟,在三组术后(T4)后10分钟监控。分别在T0,T3和T4收集血液,用于血气检查。 e,Ne和COS浓度被检测到。结果:I基团T2的HR显着慢下降(P <0.05),SBP和DBP显着降低(P <0.05),并且显着低于II组和II组中的DBP III(P <0.05),而每个定时点的SPO2差异不显着(P> 0.05)。 II组T2和T3的HR,SBP,DBP和地图显着升高(P <0.05)。 HR,SBP,DBP和SPO2在III组中每个定时点的差异不显着(P> 0.05)。 II组T3的N,Ne和COS浓度显着升高(P <0.05),并且在I和III组之间的​​N,NE和COS浓度的差异不显着(P> 0.05)。 T3和T4的pH,PACO 2和HCO 3显着高于T0(P <0.05),PACO2和HCO3-在T3中,I基团I的T3显着高于II和III族(P <) 0.05),T4的PACO2显着高于II和III组(P <0.05)。 II和III族之​​间的pH,PACO 2和HCO3-在T0,T3和T4之间的差异没有显着差异(p> 0.05)。结论:在妇科腹腔镜手术中,三种麻醉方法可以达到令人满意的麻醉效果但是,合并的一般硬膜外麻醉对血压,呼吸和循环的效果很小,可以缓解压力反应,并保持良好的血液气体状态;因此,应该首选。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号