首页> 外文期刊>老年心脏病学杂志(英文版) >Safety and efficacy of transradial coronary angiography and intervention in patients older than 80 years: from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of transradial coronary angiography and intervention in patients older than 80 years: from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry

机译:经radi动脉冠状动脉造影和80岁以上患者的安全性和有效性:来自韩国经from动脉介入前瞻性注册中心

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Radial artery access for coronary procedures is a safe and beneficial technique.However,elderly patients have been considered as a higher risk group of access site related complications compared to younger patients.This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and safety oftransradial coronary angiography or intervention in the elderly.Methods A total of 6132 patients from Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry at 20 centers were analyzed.Patients were divided into the non-elderly group (n =5667) and the elderly (≥ 80 years) group (n =465).Using propensity score matching,the elderly group (n =465) was compared with one-to-one matched the non-elderly group (n =465).Results After propensity score matching,mean age was 64.3 ± 10.3 years in the non-elderly group and 83.5 ± 3.3 years in the elderly group.There was no difference of procedural characteristics,procedural and fluoroscopic times.Access site cross-over rate was not different between the non-elderly group and elderly group (7.5% vs.6.2%,P =0.074).Bleeding complications occurred similarly in two groups (2.6% of the non-elderly group vs.1.9% of the elderly group,P =0.660).Access site complications were 1.9% of the non-elderly group and 0.9% of the elderly group (P =0.263).Both of in hospital death and cardiovascular death for one year were also similar between two groups.Conclusions Transradial angiography or intervention was safe and feasible in elderly patients.Complication rates and clinical outcomes in elderly patients were comparable with those in non-elderly patients.
机译:背景Rad动脉入路用于冠状动脉手术是一种安全且有益的技术。但是,与年轻患者相比,老年患者被认为是与进入部位相关并发症的高危人群。本研究旨在探讨经radi动脉冠状动脉造影或放射治疗的可行性和安全性。方法对韩国20个中心的韩国radi动脉介入前瞻性登记处的6132例患者进行分析,将患者分为非老年人组(n = 5667)和老年人(≥80岁)组(n = 465)。 )。通过倾向得分匹配,将老年人(n = 465)与非老年人(n = 465)进行一对一匹配。结果倾向得分匹配后,平均年龄为64.3±10.3岁非老年组和老年组为83.5±3.3岁。程序特征,手术和透视时间无差异。非老年组之间的进入部位交叉率无差异两组的出血并发症发生率相似(非老年人组为2.6%,老年人组为1.9%,P = 0.660)。非老年组的并发症为1.9%,老年组的并发症为0.9%(P = 0.263)。两组的住院死亡率和一年的心血管死亡率也相似。结论经radi动脉血管造影或介入治疗是安全可行的老年患者的并发症发生率和临床结局与非老年患者相当。

著录项

  • 来源
    《老年心脏病学杂志(英文版)》 |2017年第2期|81-86|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Cardiovascular & Arrhythmia Center, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

    Cardiovascular & Arrhythmia Center, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

    Cardiovascular & Arrhythmia Center, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

    Division of Cardiology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, South Korea;

    Division of Cardiology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea;

    Division of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea;

    Department of Cardiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

    Department of Cardiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea;

    Department of Cardiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号