首页> 外文期刊>临床与转化肝病杂志(英文版) >Efficacy and Safety of Direct-acting Antivirals in Hepatitis C Virus-infected Patients Taking Proton Pump Inhibitors
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Direct-acting Antivirals in Hepatitis C Virus-infected Patients Taking Proton Pump Inhibitors

机译:丙型肝炎病毒感染的质子泵抑制剂患者中直接作用抗病毒药的疗效和安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background and Aims:Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy is the cornerstone of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Eradication of HCV,predicted by the attainment of a sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks following DAA therapy,is the goal of this treatment.Interestingly,recent studies have reported the possible association between HCV-infected patients with DAA therapy concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and lower odds of achieving SVR.This meta-analysis was conducted to summarize all available data and to estimate this potential association.Methods:Comprehensive literature review was conducted by first searching the Medline and Embase databases through March 2017 to identify all studies that investigated the safety and efficacy of DAAs in patients with HCV infection taking PPIs versus those without PPIs.Adjusted point estimates from each study were combined by the generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.Results:Nine cohort studies with 32,684 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.The use of PPIs concomitant with DAAs among HCV-infected patients was associated with lower odds of achieving SVR compared with non-PPI users (pooled odds ratio (OR):0.74,95% confidence interval (CI):0.63-0.88,I2 =24%).Subgroup analysis addressed the association between PPIs use and SVR12 demonstrated the association of PPI users showing lower odds of achieving SVR12 compared with those with no use of PPIs (pooled OR:0.68,95% CI:0.51-0.9,I2 =33%).Conclusions:This study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of failure to achieve SVR in HCV-infected patients taking DAA with PPIs compared to non-PPI users.Providers should consider whether PPI therapy is indicated for patients and withdraw of PPI therapy in the absence of indications,especially while on DAA therapy.
机译:背景和目的:直接作用抗病毒(DAA)疗法是治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的基石。通过在DAA治疗后12周内获得持续的病毒学反应(SVR)预测的HCV,是这种治疗的目标。兴趣的是,最近的研究报告了HCV感染患者在DAA治疗伴随的DAA治疗患者之间的可能关联,伴随着质子泵抑制剂(PPI)和逐步实现SVR的几率。进行了META分析以总结所有可用数据和估计这一潜在协会。通过首次在2017年3月搜索Medline和Embase数据库来确定全面的文献综述,以确定所有研究患者对HCV感染患者的患者的所有研究,而没有PPI。每项研究的调整点估计由Dersimonian和Laird的通用逆转方差方法组合。结果:九个Cohort ST具有32,684名参与者的UDIES达到了资格标准,并包含在META分析中。与非PPI用户相比,使用HCV感染患者中DAAs的PPI与DAAs的使用较低(汇总赔率比(或) :0.74,95%置信区间(CI):0.63-0.88,I2 = 24%)。亚组分析解决了PPI之间的关联,SVR12表明PPI用户的关联显示与没有使用的人相比,PPI用户逐步实现了SVR12的几率PPI(汇集或:0.68,95%CI:0.51-0.9,I2 = 33%)。结论:本研究表明,与非PPI用户相比,使用PPI的HCV感染患者达到SVR的失败风险显着增加.Providers应考虑是否针对患者提出了PPI治疗并在没有适应症的情况下撤出PPI治疗,特别是在DAA治疗中。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号