首页> 中文期刊> 《国际眼科杂志:英文版》 >Efficacy of wet-lab training versus surgical-simulator training on performance of ophthalmology residents during chopping in cataract surgery

Efficacy of wet-lab training versus surgical-simulator training on performance of ophthalmology residents during chopping in cataract surgery

         

摘要

AIM: To analyze whether wet-lab training(WLT) or surgical-simulator training(SST) is better for ophthalmology residents to master the chopping technique.METHODS: Sixty ophthalmology residents(in their second year) and three cataract surgeons participated in the study. The residents were randomly separated into two groups, WLT group and SST group. The residents in WLT group were asked to perform 10 trials of chopping using pig eyes and scored by the surgeons, and then they performed and scored using simulator for one time. The residents in SST group underwent 10 trials of chopping using simulator, and the simulator scored each trail. Then, this group were asked to perform the chopping using pig eyes and scored by the surgeons. At last, we investigated the residents’ satisfaction about the training.RESULTS: The demographic characteristics had no significant differences between the two groups. Recorded by the simulator, the residents in SST group got significantly higher overall score(83.90±1.31) than WLT group(78.73±1.92, P=0.03). And the residents in SST group got less corner area injured, and they spend less time than WLT group(P<0.05). Moreover, the residents in WLT group used more ultrasonic energy value than SST group(P=0.03). However, scored by the surgeons, the residents in two groups got nearly the same overall score. The residents in WLT group performed better on the frequencies of posterior capsule torn and incisional stress(P=0.03, 0.008, respectively). In the survey, the residents in two groups held the same opinion that the training was helpful and they strongly recommended this training. And all of them enjoyed the training, and enjoyed being randomized in their own group. However, with respect to the realistic character, the residents thought that WLT was better than SST(P<0.001).CONCLUSION: Both of the Eyesi surgical-stimulator and the wet-lab improve the residents’ chopping ability and each has its own advantages. The combination of the two training ways could be considered to be a part of the training curriculum for new residents.

著录项

  • 来源
    《国际眼科杂志:英文版》 |2021年第3期|P.366-370|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Ophtalmology the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi''an Jiaotong University Xi''an 710061 Shaanxi Province China;

    Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University Nanchang 330006 Jiangxi Provnice China;

    Department of Ophtalmology the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi''an Jiaotong University Xi''an 710061 Shaanxi Province China;

    Department of Ophtalmology the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi''an Jiaotong University Xi''an 710061 Shaanxi Province China;

    Department of Ophthalmology Shaanxi People''s Hospital Xi''an 710068 Shaanxi Province China;

    Department of Ophtalmology the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi''an Jiaotong University Xi''an 710061 Shaanxi Province China;

    Department of Ophtalmology the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi''an Jiaotong University Xi''an 710061 Shaanxi Province China;

  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类 声学工程;
  • 关键词

    chopping in cataract; simulator; wet-lab;

    机译:在白内障中切碎;模拟器;湿-实验室;
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号