首页> 外文期刊>国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版) >Evaluationofsurgicalprocedureselection basedonintraoperativefreeportalpressure measurementinpatientswithportalhypertension
【24h】

Evaluationofsurgicalprocedureselection basedonintraoperativefreeportalpressure measurementinpatientswithportalhypertension

机译:基于门静脉高压症患者术中自由门压力测量的手术程序选择评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Various surgical procedures can be used to treat liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. How to select the most appropriate procedure for patients with portal hypertension has become a dififcult problem. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the value of intraoperative free portal pressure (FPP) and postoperative complications, and to explore the signiifcance of intraoperative FPP measurement with respect to surgical procedure selection. METHODS: The clinical data of 187 patients with portal hypertension who received pericardial devascularization and proximal splenorenal shunt combined with devascularization (combined operation) at the Department of General Surgery in our hospital from January 2001 to September 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the patients who received pericardial devascularization, those with a postoperative FPP≥22 mmHg were included in a high-pressure group (n=68), and those with FPP<22 mmHg were in a low-pressure group (n=49). Seventy patients who received the combined operation comprised a combined group. The intraoperative FPP measurement changes at different times, and the incidence of postoperative complications in the three groups of patients were compared. RESULTS: The postoperative FPP value in the high-pressure group was 27.5±2.3 mmHg, which was signiifcantly higher than that of the low-pressure (20.9±1.8 mmHg) or combined groups (21.7±2.5 mmHg). The rebleeding rate in the high-pressure group was signiifcantly higher than that in the low-pressure and combined groups. The incidence rates of postoperative hepatic encephalopathy and liver failure were not statistically different among the three groups. The mortality due to rebleeding in the low-pressure and combined groups (0.84%) was signiifcantly lower than that of the high-pressure group. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that FPP is a critical measurement for surgical procedure selection in patients with portal hypertension. A FPP value ≥22 mmHg after splenectomy and devascularization alone is an important indicator that an additional proximal splenorenal shunt needs to be performed.
机译:背景:各种外科手术方法均可用于治疗肝硬化和门脉高压症。如何为门静脉高压症患者选择最合适的程序已成为一个难题。本研究旨在分析术中自由门静脉压力(FPP)值与术后并发症之间的关系,并探讨术中FPP测量对手术程序选择的意义。 方法:回顾性分析我院2001年1月至2008年9月收治的187例门脉高压合并心包血运和近端脾肾分流加血运(联合手术)患者的临床资料。在接受心包血运重建术的患者中,高压组(n = 68)包括术后FPP≥22mmHg,低压组(n = 49)包括FPP <22 mmHg。接受联合手术的70例患者组成了联合组。术中FPP测量值在不同时间发生变化,并比较了三组患者的术后并发症发生率。 结果:高压组术后FPP值为27.5±2.3 mmHg,明显高于低压组(20.9±1.8 mmHg)或联合组(21.7±2.5 mmHg)。高压组的再出血率明显高于低压组和联合组。三组术后肝性脑病和肝衰竭的发生率无统计学差异。低压组和合并组的再出血死亡率(0.84%)明显低于高压组。 结论:研究表明FPP是门脉高压患者手术选择的关键指标。单独进行脾切除和血运重建后的FPP值≥22mmHg是一个重要的指标,表明需要进行额外的近端脾肾分流。

著录项

  • 来源
    《国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版)》 |2010年第003期|269-274|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China Sun YW, Chen W, Luo M, Hua R, Liu W, Huo YM, Wu ZY and Cao H;

    Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China Sun YW, Chen W, Luo M, Hua R, Liu W, Huo YM, Wu ZY and Cao H;

    Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China Sun YW, Chen W, Luo M, Hua R, Liu W, Huo YM, Wu ZY and Cao H;

    Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China Sun YW, Chen W, Luo M, Hua R, Liu W, Huo YM, Wu ZY and Cao H;

    Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China Sun YW, Chen W, Luo M, Hua R, Liu W, Huo YM, Wu ZY and Cao H;

    Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China Sun YW, Chen W, Luo M, Hua R, Liu W, Huo YM, Wu ZY and Cao H;

    Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China Sun YW, Chen W, Luo M, Hua R, Liu W, Huo YM, Wu ZY and Cao H;

    Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China Sun YW, Chen W, Luo M, Hua R, Liu W, Huo YM, Wu ZY and Cao H;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:39:21
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号