首页> 外文期刊>国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版) >Outpatientversusinpatientlaparoscopic cholecystectomy:asinglecenterclinicalanalysis
【24h】

Outpatientversusinpatientlaparoscopic cholecystectomy:asinglecenterclinicalanalysis

机译:门诊与住院腹腔镜胆囊切除术:单中心临床分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OPLC) developed in the United States and other developed countries as one of the fast-track surgeries performed in ambulatory centers. However, this practice has not been installed as a routine practice in the major general hospitals and medical centers in China. We designed this case-control study to evaluate the feasibility, beneifts, and safety of OPLC. METHODS: Two hundred patients who had received laparo-scopic cholecystectomy for various benign gallbladder pathologies from April 2007 to December 2008 at Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University School of Medicine were classiifed into two groups:OPLC group (100 patients), and control group (100), who were designated for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (IPLC). Data were collected for age, gender, indications for surgery, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, operative time, blood loss during surgery, length of hospitalization, and intra- and post-operative complications. The expenses of surgery and in-hospital care were calculated and analyzed. The operative procedures and instrumentation were standardized for laparo-scopic cholecystectomy, and the procedures were performed by two attending surgeons specialized in laparoscopic surgery. OPLC was selected according to the standard criteria developed by surgeons in our hospital after review. Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy were recorded and documented. RESULTS:One hundred patients underwent IPLC following the selection criteria for the procedure, and 99% completed the procedure. The median operative time for IPLC was 24.0 minutes, blood loss was 16.2 ml, and the time for resuming liquid then soft diet was 10.7 hours and 22.0 hours, respectively. Only one patient had postoperative urinary infection. The mean hospital stay for IPLC was 58.2 hours, and the cost for surgery and hospitalization was 8770.5 RMB yuan on average. Follow-up showed that 90% of the patients were satisifed with the procedure. In the OPLC group, 99%of the patients underwent the procedure with a median operative time of 21.6 minutes and bleeding of 14.7 ml. The patients took liquid 11.3 hours then soft diet 20.1 hours after surgery. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 28.5 hours. In this group, 89%of the patients were discharged within the ifrst 24 hours, and the remaining 11%were released within 48 hours after surgery. Two patients developed local complications. The cost for surgery and hospitalization was 7235.7 RMB yuan, which was 17.5% less than that in the IPLC group. At follow-up, 94%of the patients were satisifed with the surgery and short hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: OPLC can effectively treat a variety of benign, non-acute gallbladder diseases with shortened waiting time and postoperative hospital stay. OPLC beneifts the hospital with a rapid bed turnover rate, and reduces cost for surgery and hospitalization.
机译:背景:门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术(OPLC)在美国和其他发达国家开发,作为在救护中心所进行的快速轨道手术之一。但是,这种做法尚未作为中国主要普通医院和医疗中心的常规实践。我们设计了这种案例控制研究,以评估OPLC的可行性,良性和安全性。 方法:从2007年4月到2008年4月到2008年12月,南京大学医学院金陵医院的各种良性胆囊病理学患者分为两组:OPLC组(100名患者)和控制为住院性腹腔镜胆囊切除术(IPLC)指定的组(100)。数据被收集为年龄,性别,手术迹象,美国麻醉学会(ASA)课程,手术时间,手术期间的血液损失,住院时间和术中和术后并发症。计算并分析了手术和住院医院的费用。操作术例和仪器标准化为raparo-scopic胆囊切除术,并通过两次专门从事腹腔镜手术的外科医生进行该程序。审查后,根据外科医生开发的标准标准选择了OPLC。记录并记录了从腹腔镜转化为开放胆囊切除术的原因。结果结果:百家患者在遴选准则下进行的IPLC进行的程序,99%完成了该程序。 IPLC的中值操作时间为24.0分钟,失血为16.2毫升,恢复液体的时间分别为10.7小时和22.0小时。只有一名患者患有术后尿感染。 IPLC的平均医院住宿时间为58.2小时,手术和住院费用平均为8770.5元人民币。随访表明,90%的患者满足了该程序。在OPLC组中,99%的患者接受了21.6分钟的中位手术时间和14.7毫升的术中的程序。患者服用液体11.3小时,然后在手术后20.1小时软饮生。平均术后住院入住时间为28.5小时。在该组中,89%的患者在IFRST 24小时内排出,其余11%在手术后48小时内释放。两名患者发生了局部并发症。手术和住院费用为7235.7元人民币,比IPLC集团少于17.5%。随访时,94%的患者随着手术和短期住院而满足。 结论:OPLC可以有效治疗各种良性的非急性胆囊疾病,缩短等待时间和术后住院。 OPLC培养了床位率快速的医院,并降低了手术和住院费用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版)》 |2010年第001期|60-64|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China Ji W, Ding K, Li LT, Wang D, Li N and Li JS;

    Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China Ji W, Ding K, Li LT, Wang D, Li N and Li JS;

    Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China Ji W, Ding K, Li LT, Wang D, Li N and Li JS;

    Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China Ji W, Ding K, Li LT, Wang D, Li N and Li JS;

    Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China Ji W, Ding K, Li LT, Wang D, Li N and Li JS;

    Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China Ji W, Ding K, Li LT, Wang D, Li N and Li JS;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:39:20
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号