首页> 外文期刊>国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版) >Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis:comparison with other scoring systems in predicting severity and organ failure
【24h】

Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis:comparison with other scoring systems in predicting severity and organ failure

机译:床旁急性胰腺炎严重程度指数:与其他评分系统预测严重程度和器官衰竭的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The  early  identification  of  severe  acute pancreatitis is important for the management and for improving outcomes. The bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP)  has  been  considered  as  an  accurate  method  for  risk stratification  in  patients  with  acute  pancreatitis.  This  study aimed to evaluate the comparative usefulness of the BISAP. METHODS: We  retrospectively  analyzed  303  patients  with acute pancreatitis diagnosed at our hospital from March 2007 to  December  2010.  BISAP,  APACHE-II,  Ranson  criteria,  and CT  severity  index  (CTSI)  of  all  patients  were  calculated.  We stratified  the  number  of  patiants  with  severe  pancreatitis, pancreatic  necrosis,  and  organ  failure  as  well  as  the  number of deaths by BISAP score. We used the area under the receiver-operating  curve  (AUC)  to  compare  BISAP  with  other  scoring systems,  C-reactive  protein  (CRP),  hematocrit,  and  body mass  index  (BMI)  with  regard  to  prediction  of  severe  acute pancreatitis, necrosis, organ failure, and death. RESULTS: Of  the  303  patiants,  31  (10.2%)  were  classified  as having severe acute pancreatitis. Organ failure occurred in 23 (7.6%) patients, pancreatic necrosis in 40 (13.2%), and death in 6 (2.0%). A BISAP score of 2 was a statistically significant cutoff value for the diagnosis of severe acute pancreatitis, organ failure, and mortality. AUCs for BISAP predicting severe pancreatitis and death were 0.80 and 0.86, respectively, which were similar to those for APACHE-II (0.80, 0.87) and Ranson criteria (0.74, 0.74) and greater than AUCs for CTSI (0.67, 0.42). The AUC for organ failure predicted by BISAP, APACHE-II, Ranson criteria, and CTSI was 0.93, 0.95, 0.84 and 0.57, respectively. AUCs for BISAP predicting severity, organ failure, and death were greater than those for CRP (0.69, 0.80, 0.72), hematocrit (0.45, 0.35, 0.14), and BMI (0.41, 0.47, 0.17). CONCLUSION: The BISAP predicts severity, death, and especially organ failure in acute pancreatitis as well as APACHE-II does and better than Ranson criteria, CTSI, CRP, hematocrit, and BMI.
机译:背景:早期识别重症急性胰腺炎对于管理和改善结果很重要。急性胰腺炎(BISAP)的严重程度床旁指数被认为是急性胰腺炎患者风险分层的准确方法。这项研究旨在评估BISAP的比较有用性。 方法:回顾性分析2007年3月至2010年12月在本院就诊的急性胰腺炎303例患者。计算BISAP,APACHE-II,Ranson标准,所有患者的CT严重度指数(CTSI)。通过BISAP评分,我们对患有严重胰腺炎,胰腺坏死,器官衰竭的患者的数量进行了分层。我们在“受试者工作曲线”(AUC)下使用了该区域,以将BISAP与其他评分系统,C反应蛋白(CRP),血细胞比容和身体质量指数(BMI)进行比较,以预测严重的器官,急性胰腺炎。失败,死亡。 结果:303例患者中,31例(10.2%)被归类为“重症”急性胰腺炎。 23例(7.6%)患者发生器官衰竭,40例(13.2%)发生胰腺坏死,6例(2.0%)死亡。 BISAP的2分评分在统计学上对严重急性胰腺炎,器官衰竭,死亡率和死亡率的诊断具有重要意义。 BISAP预测严重胰腺炎和死亡的AUC分别为0.80和0.86,与APACHE-II的(0.80,0.87)和Ranson标准(0.74,0.74)的AUC和(SI)的SI分别大于0.8。由BISAP,APACHE-II,Ranson标准和CTSI预测的器官衰竭的AUC分别为0.93、0.95、0.84和0.57。 BISAP预测严重性,器官衰竭和死亡的AUC比CRP(0.69,0.80,0.72),血细胞比容(0.45,0.35,0.14),BMI(0.41,0.47,0.17)高。 结论:BISAP预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度,死亡,尤其是器官衰竭的发生率与APACHE-II一样好,并且优于Ranson准则,CTSI,CRP,血细胞比容,BMI。

著录项

  • 来源
    《国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版)》 |2013年第006期|645-650|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea Park JY, Jeon TJ, Ha TH, Hwang JT, Sinn DH, 0h TH, Shin WC and Choi WC;

    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea Park JY, Jeon TJ, Ha TH, Hwang JT, Sinn DH, 0h TH, Shin WC and Choi WC;

    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea Park JY, Jeon TJ, Ha TH, Hwang JT, Sinn DH, 0h TH, Shin WC and Choi WC;

    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea Park JY, Jeon TJ, Ha TH, Hwang JT, Sinn DH, 0h TH, Shin WC and Choi WC;

    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea Park JY, Jeon TJ, Ha TH, Hwang JT, Sinn DH, 0h TH, Shin WC and Choi WC;

    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea Park JY, Jeon TJ, Ha TH, Hwang JT, Sinn DH, 0h TH, Shin WC and Choi WC;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号