首页> 外文期刊>国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版) >Impact of periampullary diverticula on the outcome and fluoroscopy time in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
【24h】

Impact of periampullary diverticula on the outcome and fluoroscopy time in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

机译:壶腹憩室对内镜逆行胰胆管造影术结果和透视时间的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: It  is  unclear  whether  the  presence  of periampullary diverticula (PAD) affects technical success and complication  rates  during  endoscopic  retrograde  cholangio-pancreatography  (ERCP).  Moreover,  the  impact  of  PAD  on fluoroscopy duration is still unknown. The present study aimed to  investigate  the  success  rate  and  difficulty  of  common  bile duct  (CBD)  cannulation,  post-procedure  complications  and fluoroscopy duration in patients with and without PAD. METHODS: Patients  from  January  2008  to  December  2010 with  PAD  (group  A)  and  without  PAD  (group  B)  and  similar indications for therapeutic ERCP were prospectively compared. The  comparison  included  patient  characteristics,  findings of  ERCP,  and  details  of  procedure  and  fluoroscopy  time.  The influence of papilla's location with respect to the diverticulum on procedure was also investigated. RESULTS: A  total  of  428  consecutive  patients  who  had undergone  therapeutic  ERCP  for  similar  indications  were divided in two groups according to the presence (group A, 107 patients) or absence (group B, 321 patients) of PAD. The mean age and ASA score of the patients with PAD were significantly higher than those patients without PAD. The main indication was  choledocholithiasis.  Successful  final  CBD  cannulation was achieved in 97.20% of the patients in group A vs 99.69% in group B (P=0.05). CBD diameter, number of stones and the largest  stone  size  were  significantly  higher  in  group  A  than group  B  (P<0.001).  Complete  clearance  of  the  CBD  after  the first attempt was achieved in 85.86% and 94.75% of the patients in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.03). In both groups, the time  needed  to  complete  the  procedure  and  fluoroscopy  time was  significantly  longer  in  patients  with  PAD  (22.87  vs  18.99 minutes,  P<0.001;  76.51  vs  47.42  seconds,  P<0.001).  There was  no  significant  difference  between  the  two  groups  in  the complication rate. The type of papilla's location with respect to the  diverticulum  did  not  influence  the  total  cannulation  rate and post-procedure complications. CONCLUSION: The  presence  of  a  PAD  does  not  affect  the success rate and complications of therapeutic ERCP in expert hands; however, the fluoroscopy time is significantly longer in patients with PAD.
机译:背景:目前尚不清楚内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术中是否存在壶腹周围憩室(PAD)会影响其技术性和并发症发生率。此外,PAD对荧光检查的持续时间的影响仍然未知。本研究的目的是调查在有或没有PAD的患者中,常见的胆总管(CBD)插管,术后并发症和荧光检查持续时间的成功率和难易程度。 方法:比较2008年1月至2010年12月使用PAD的患者(A组)和不使用PAD的患者(B组)和类似的治疗性ERCP适应症。比较包括患者的特征,ERCP的发现,程序的细节和荧光检查的时间。还研究了乳头位置对程序对憩室的影响。 结果:总共428例接受了ERCP治疗的ERCP相似的适应症的连续患者根据A的存在(A组,107例患者)或不存在的(B组,321 PA例)分为两个组。具有PAD的患者的平均工资和ASA得分明显高于没有PAD的患者的平均得分。主要适应症是胆总管结石症。 B组中97.20%的患者成功完成了最终的CBD插管,B组中99.69%的患者获得了成功(P = 0.05)。 CBD直径,“结石数量”和“最大结石尺寸”在A组中明显高于B组(P <0.001)。 A组和B组患者中,首次尝试后的CBD完全清除率分别为85.86%和94.75%。(P = 0.03)。在这两个组中,完成PAD手术的患者所需的时间均显着延长了[P.0.001]; [22.87%vs. 18.99分钟,P <0.001; 76.51 vs. 47.42秒,P <0.001]。两组的并发症发生率没有显着差异。尊重乳头憩室的乳头位置类型不会影响总插管率和术后并发症。 结论:PAD的存在并不影响专家手中治疗性ERCP的成功率和并发症。但是,PAD患者的荧光检查时间明显更长。

著录项

  • 来源
    《国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版)》 |2013年第004期|408-414|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, G. Gennimatas General Hospital Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Tziomalos K, Beltsis A, Lazaraki G and Terzoudis S, and 2nd Department of Internal Medicine Zavos C and Kountouras J, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece;

    Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, G. Gennimatas General Hospital Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Tziomalos K, Beltsis A, Lazaraki G and Terzoudis S, and 2nd Department of Internal Medicine Zavos C and Kountouras J, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece;

    Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, G. Gennimatas General Hospital Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Tziomalos K, Beltsis A, Lazaraki G and Terzoudis S, and 2nd Department of Internal Medicine Zavos C and Kountouras J, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece;

    Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, G. Gennimatas General Hospital Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Tziomalos K, Beltsis A, Lazaraki G and Terzoudis S, and 2nd Department of Internal Medicine Zavos C and Kountouras J, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece;

    Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, G. Gennimatas General Hospital Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Tziomalos K, Beltsis A, Lazaraki G and Terzoudis S, and 2nd Department of Internal Medicine Zavos C and Kountouras J, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece;

    Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, G. Gennimatas General Hospital Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Tziomalos K, Beltsis A, Lazaraki G and Terzoudis S, and 2nd Department of Internal Medicine Zavos C and Kountouras J, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:39:17
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号