首页> 外文期刊>老年医学(英文) >Effectiveness of a Group Exercise Class vs. Home Exercise Program as a Follow-up to Physical Therapy for Older Adults with High Fall Risk
【24h】

Effectiveness of a Group Exercise Class vs. Home Exercise Program as a Follow-up to Physical Therapy for Older Adults with High Fall Risk

机译:群体运动级的有效性与家庭锻炼计划作为老年人风险高年龄成年人的物理治疗的后续行动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This quasi-experimental study compared the results of a traditional model of physical therapy(PT)care to a PT wellness model known as GroupHab.The traditional model included discharge from PT with a home exercise program(HEP)to be self-administered with or without the addition of a community-based exercise program.The wellness model included participation in a PT-designed and supervised group exercise program(GroupHab class)in an outpatient clinical setting following discharge from PT.Independent t-tests were used to compare the number of falls,exercise frequency,and exercise duration between the two groups.A repeated measures,analysis of variance(RM-ANOVA)compared changes in balance confidence scores both within and between groups,and a multivariate analysis of variance(MANOVA)analyzed group differences across multiple quality of life ratings using the SF-20.All data were analyzed at the 0.05 alpha level using SPSS 24 statistical software.Our results showed a significantly greater reduction in recurrent falls among the GroupHab wellness group compared to the HEP group(t=2.811,p=0.009).The resulting odds ratio for subsequent falls was 2.2 among HEP participants and 0.2 among GroupHab participants.Exercise adherence was also greater for those who participated in the GroupHab class.They documented greater exercise frequency(t=-3.253,p=0.002)and more exercise minutes(t=-7.188,p<0.001)than those who participated in the HEP.When comparing changes in the participants’balance confidence,we found an average increase of 5%among GroupHab participants compared to a 6%decrease among HEP participants(F=16.877,p<0.001,power=0.981).Although our multivariate analysis of the SF-20 scores revealed no significant difference overall(F=0.768,p=0.73),the univariate analyses showed significantly greater improvements among GroupHab participants in selected areas of physical function.These results suggest that at-risk older adults who are discharged into a functionally-based group exercise class are less likely to experience recurrent falls and are more likely to have more confidence in their balance than those who are discharged with a standard HEP and/or use of community-based exercise classes.
机译:该准实验研究将传统的物理治疗模型(PT)护理结果与称为GROUPHAB称为GROUPHAB的PT健康模型的结果。传统的模型包括从PT与家庭运动计划(HEP)排放,以自我管理或如果没有添加基于社区的锻炼计划。康复模型包括参与PT设计和监督组运动程序(Grouphab类)在从Pt.Independent T-Tests排出后的门诊临床环境中进行了临床临床环境,用于比较数量两组之间的跌倒,运动频率和锻炼持续时间。反复措施,方差分析(RM-Anova)与组内和之间的平衡置信度评分的变化和变化的变化(MANOVA)分析的组差异分析使用SF-20横跨多种寿命评级。使用SPSS 24统计软件在0.05 alpha级别分析数据。我们的结果显示出明显更大的红色与HEP组(T = 2.811,P = 0.009)相比,递归中的复发性均落在Grouphab健康组中。后续下降的结果比率为2.2,在HEP参与者中,0.2在GROUPHAB参与者中。对于那些人来说,依从性也更大参加了Grouphab类。他们记录了更大的运动频率(t = -3.253,p = 0.002)和比参加Hep.的人更高的运动时间(t = -7.188,p <0.001),当比较参与者的变化时平衡信心,我们发现HEP参与者之间的平均增加5%,而HEP参与者减少6%(F = 16.877,P <0.001,POWER = 0.981)。尽管我们对SF-20分数的多变量分析显示没有显着总体差异(f = 0.768,p = 0.73),单变量分析显示出特殊的物理功能领域的Grouphab参与者的显着改善。这些结果表明,危险的老年人被排放到基于功能的群体运动中课程不太可能经历反复下降的可能性,并且更有可能对他们的平衡有更多的信心,而那些与标准律师的标准和/或使用基于社区的锻炼课程的平衡。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号